{"core-extras.96d330537a":"Base IR","core-extras.bee831a169":"Substrate","core-extras.61a0822826":"Apps on Core","core-extras.15438cc098":"not supported","core-extras.ad565d9d01":"Feature","core-extras.0155bf03e5":"Segment legend","core-extras.8b7110078e":"Algorithm groups by data type","core-extras.25ab4276a6":"Scrollable capability matrix","page-breadcrumb.c766e66518":"Breadcrumb","section_st_a1_display-split.7c9a7c0610":"Detail","section_st_f1_cta-dark.90e40d5043":"Get started","uc-pub-business-glyph.3872f7c35b":"The rule beside the decision","uc-pub-business-glyph.a0bd1ac902":"One record, four readers","uc-pub-business-glyph.377013e33a":"In force","uc-pub-business-glyph.3583dbf1df":"Rule and case","uc-pub-business-glyph.113d9d3ec0":"Statute versions","uc-pub-business-glyph.95428ca5d3":"The case","uc-pub-business-glyph.d9e7bddeb5":"Intake","uc-pub-business-glyph.ef136f1008":"Assessment","uc-pub-business-glyph.7f59a1f1d5":"Decision","uc-pub-business-glyph.5256fffffb":"Notice","uc-pub-business-glyph.2ace9b83b6":"Appeal route","uc-pub-business-glyph.4b4403a89f":"Who reads the same record","uc-pub-business-glyph.a1fdaa6b2a":"Operations","uc-pub-business-glyph.e69b0a5ec7":"Day to day casework","uc-pub-business-glyph.3fc79400cb":"Procurement","uc-pub-business-glyph.a1765b3f9d":"Ready for a challenge","uc-pub-business-glyph.2c25e61ac8":"Audit court","uc-pub-business-glyph.a0c6742253":"Review without a rebuild","uc-pub-business-glyph.a126845045":"Public records","uc-pub-business-glyph.31eefa4be6":"Requests answered from one file","uc-pub-business-glyph.c67d4d13fb":"Built and run under EU rules","uc-pub-business-glyph.bc87202f40":"Nothing reconstructed afterwards","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.76bce9e5fb":"A letter with its reasons","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.a18c83078c":"The rule, the facts, the person","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.7f59a1f1d5":"Decision","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.82dd86d768":"The rule used","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.be7fd18100":"What was counted","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.1c0bb0c7e9":"Who was responsible","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.58144dbe3f":"How to ask again","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.b85bf86588":"Read the reason","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.98d489d80a":"In plain words, next to the decision.","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.cf94bdf391":"Ask a question","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.39f4e5c099":"The route is printed on the letter.","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.e96f9ee5fd":"Ask for a second look","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.558c850e3c":"The appeal path is part of the record.","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.42169117b6":"Your case stays yours","uc-pub-consumer-glyph.7205408474":"Handled in your own country","uc-pub-technical-glyph.10cd48ee24":"Decision record","uc-pub-technical-glyph.9d504bd816":"statute pinned, jurisdiction fixed","uc-pub-technical-glyph.17d120d8bb":"Replayable","uc-pub-technical-glyph.6bf09f3791":"Statute versions and the case","uc-pub-technical-glyph.113d9d3ec0":"Statute versions","uc-pub-technical-glyph.377013e33a":"In force","uc-pub-technical-glyph.95428ca5d3":"The case","uc-pub-technical-glyph.d9e7bddeb5":"Intake","uc-pub-technical-glyph.ef136f1008":"Assessment","uc-pub-technical-glyph.7f59a1f1d5":"Decision","uc-pub-technical-glyph.5256fffffb":"Notice","uc-pub-technical-glyph.f9312169ef":"Pinned","uc-pub-technical-glyph.2ace9b83b6":"Appeal route","uc-pub-technical-glyph.1c013851a3":"What the record holds","uc-pub-technical-glyph.e5b0674f92":"Pinning","uc-pub-technical-glyph.0d641b8fe1":"consolidated version","uc-pub-technical-glyph.83c6d723cb":"Packet","uc-pub-technical-glyph.5ff90d58cf":"signed per decision","uc-pub-technical-glyph.cda05ca6d8":"Surface","uc-pub-technical-glyph.327a55f82d":"Deployment","uc-pub-technical-glyph.965569bdcd":"air gapped by default","uc-pub-technical-glyph.8234ac5621":"Attached to every decision","uc-pub-technical-glyph.dd1569bc6b":"Statute","uc-pub-technical-glyph.b78db885ef":"Consolidated version","uc-pub-technical-glyph.705e7b1a28":"Responsible officer","uc-pub-technical-glyph.1d197d39c5":"Where it runs","uc-pub-technical-glyph.3eea4b6fd1":"Managed Mesh","uc-pub-technical-glyph.4140eed4ac":"On premises","uc-pub-technical-glyph.46a62054bf":"Air gapped","uc-pub-technical-glyph.7bfd79b6dc":"Jurisdiction pinned","uc-pub-technical-glyph.3872f7c35b":"The rule beside the decision","uc-pub-technical-glyph.601eb30b3a":"Runs in your jurisdiction","use-case-public-sector.4200e72275":"Public sector","use-case-public-sector.14a29ba383":"Use Cases","use-case-public-sector.f915d44c9d":"Existing rules engines and tariff tables keep working. Dweve wraps them in a\n            deterministic decision layer that records every input, every statute, and every\n            override as the decision happens.","use-case-public-sector.88a776f81c":"Public sector, technical","use-case-public-sector.e7332f9619":"Your choice","use-case-public-sector.8bf34da1c7":"One platform","use-case-public-sector.748e1548c7":"Closed bundle for classified or statutory work.","use-case-public-sector.ec9dfc4fd3":"Fully offline","use-case-public-sector.686743c021":"Run on servers in your own building.","use-case-public-sector.08a557101e":"Your hardware","use-case-public-sector.55423877a1":"Dweve-operated public Mesh; processing boundary documented in the agreement.","use-case-public-sector.61810d3c5a":"Business Workspace","use-case-public-sector.2b1884c5a7":"One platform, three postures","use-case-public-sector.215475056e":"WHERE IT RUNS","use-case-public-sector.92a16f5060":"SDK: TS/Python/Go/Rust","use-case-public-sector.4b3258f7ec":"RFC 7807","use-case-public-sector.92af23aac4":"PROTOBUF","use-case-public-sector.dabbb6f4e1":"OPENAPI 3.1","use-case-public-sector.6fb343d564":"Integrate via REST or gRPC against a typed OpenAPI 3.1 surface. Managed through Fabric on the public Dweve Mesh for pilots. Licensed for on-prem. Air-gapped for classified or statutory work. Same API, same trace format, same replay packets across all three.","use-case-public-sector.0ff8b5b425":"Three deployment postures.","use-case-public-sector.94188e2c6c":"One API.","use-case-public-sector.34bfbaefff":"How you integrate","use-case-public-sector.80b30e032e":"Bit-identical output","use-case-public-sector.5906016d0e":"Same engine","use-case-public-sector.7294600919":"Official signs the final decision.","use-case-public-sector.8eeb40cd07":"Sign packet","use-case-public-sector.a48200d02e":"Statute version applied to the decision.","use-case-public-sector.bc2d2ce506":"Apply statute","use-case-public-sector.55ec55b864":"Rules engine produces a raw decision.","use-case-public-sector.bf57631177":"Run rules","use-case-public-sector.db376abc1d":"Inputs logged before the rules engine runs.","use-case-public-sector.9678dd9fa7":"Pin inputs","use-case-public-sector.478360978f":"Four guarantees","use-case-public-sector.c00f9811f5":"WHAT THE LAYER DOES","use-case-public-sector.3b720bec28":"SIGNED REPLAY","use-case-public-sector.6757848af7":"DETERMINISTIC","use-case-public-sector.b1234456e1":"Existing rules engines and tariff tables keep working. Dweve wraps them in a deterministic decision layer that records every input, every statute, and every override as the decision happens. The replay packet reconstructs the exact decision years later. Inputs are logged before the rules engine runs, the engine produces the raw decision, the statute version in force is applied, and the official signs the packet.","use-case-public-sector.fb834ca63c":"bit-identical replay.","use-case-public-sector.f434e76513":"Rules engines wrapped,","use-case-public-sector.b884562b83":"Decision determinism","use-case-public-sector.9030bbe906":"One signed record","use-case-public-sector.c1399f2e8f":"Four gates","use-case-public-sector.33afe8be6d":"Audit court pulls the same packets later.","use-case-public-sector.fa1703dd78":"Audit","use-case-public-sector.15f49a703e":"Award decision recorded with rule and reviewer.","use-case-public-sector.9f094fedb5":"Award","use-case-public-sector.01dd57174a":"Bid response carries the same packet references.","use-case-public-sector.ce75bff82d":"Bid","use-case-public-sector.145554fa1a":"Tender published with linked compliance artefacts.","use-case-public-sector.5656400564":"Publish","use-case-public-sector.08433110a6":"PROCUREMENT","use-case-public-sector.84070591be":"DBIA","use-case-public-sector.93a44c0517":"MEAT","use-case-public-sector.81ca871c9e":"PPD","use-case-public-sector.6536aa103b":"Procurement is the gate. Dweve produces the artefacts each framework expects, as the work happens, so the tender response is a retrieval not a reconstruction. MEAT criteria, security clearances, and data boundary assessments all draw from the same decision packets.","use-case-public-sector.54aaa010f6":"auto-evidenced per tender.","use-case-public-sector.3b8877bf0c":"PPD, DBIA, security,","use-case-public-sector.1fa2eae6cd":"Procurement compliance","use-case-public-sector.932cb3e0c2":"The decision layer never crosses a trust boundary that fails the EU AI Act high-risk\n            rules. The same topology ships on all three postures.","use-case-public-sector.d5a9f6f81a":"Three postures","use-case-public-sector.8ab2c84ed7":"One architecture","use-case-public-sector.82ebf641f5":"No outbound calls. Optional EU-only ombudsman endpoint.","use-case-public-sector.8e05a902ed":"Egress","use-case-public-sector.8c0e6f760f":"Signed packets written once, read many, EU-only replica.","use-case-public-sector.dcf17fd359":"Packet store","use-case-public-sector.6de6f8a697":"CPU-native engine, no GPU farm, no cloud ML APIs.","use-case-public-sector.7f59a1f1d5":"Decision","use-case-public-sector.7d853df929":"TLS terminate in EU, mTLS to the decision layer.","use-case-public-sector.92096d78df":"Ingress","use-case-public-sector.7f166ac611":"Four boundaries","use-case-public-sector.338ac926aa":"TOPOLOGY","use-case-public-sector.6b4217aac7":"EU ONLY","use-case-public-sector.5e905a995e":"PACKET STORE","use-case-public-sector.7e826f7af3":"TRUST","use-case-public-sector.138a224dc4":"DMZ","use-case-public-sector.cd94b11917":"Three operating models, one evidence architecture. Managed Fabric runs on the public Mesh. Licensed operation brings direct products into your data centre. Air-gapped operation protects classified or statutory work. Each model keeps decisions and evidence inside its declared trust boundary. Ingress terminates TLS in the EU, the decision runs on a CPU-native engine with no GPU farm and no cloud ML API in the path, signed packets are written once and read many on an EU-only replica, and egress makes no outbound calls.","use-case-public-sector.3ae8029f90":"per posture.","use-case-public-sector.52c48d0dc9":"Where the layers sit,","use-case-public-sector.f9790fb715":"Deployment topology","use-case-public-sector.2c2bb99178":"Determinism is asserted in the suite, not promised in prose. The same oracle run on\n            your hardware produces the same answer as on ours.","use-case-public-sector.064f903275":"Not aspirational","use-case-public-sector.aed3b8c6a7":"Verified","use-case-public-sector.ed0ff2382e":"No rounding error crosses the unit-of-last-place threshold.","use-case-public-sector.aadefaf8ed":"Correctly rounded","use-case-public-sector.cc376f246e":"Corners and ranges exercised automatically in CI.","use-case-public-sector.e02eea5453":"Property tests","use-case-public-sector.a24d9583df":"Each result compared to a high-precision reference.","use-case-public-sector.47909e2975":"256-bit oracle","use-case-public-sector.4ac72fd74a":"Bounded iteration count, no floating-point unit.","use-case-public-sector.97dab07ad3":"CORDIC compute","use-case-public-sector.b9a7f2f458":"How the bound is proven","use-case-public-sector.dc0507035e":"VERIFICATION","use-case-public-sector.481d3e216b":"PROPERTY TESTED","use-case-public-sector.fdd71ee1c4":"MPFR 256-BIT","use-case-public-sector.51ab88da6e":"0 ULP","use-case-public-sector.95ca28c4e3":"Every numerical computation in the decision path is verified against MPFR at 256-bit precision. The published result is 0 ULP, correctly rounded across the documented input domain, with property-based tests driving the corners on every release. Four methods carry that claim: bounded-iteration integer compute with no floating-point unit, comparison against a high-precision reference, corners and ranges exercised automatically in CI, and a rounding bound no result is allowed to cross.","use-case-public-sector.bed4aa0e07":"checked against an oracle.","use-case-public-sector.0479003b2b":"0 ULP transcendentals,","use-case-public-sector.5cad8b91f3":"Verified decisions","use-case-public-sector.045dedf44e":"One version per decision","use-case-public-sector.01c501a76c":"Four steps","use-case-public-sector.daabd51555":"Years later, the same version is pulled and replayed.","use-case-public-sector.75180d9dcd":"Replay later","use-case-public-sector.2526832cf1":"Deterministic compute runs the rule against the version.","use-case-public-sector.6a9eaaf8c6":"Run the decision","use-case-public-sector.5499c6baf7":"Each decision records the version that was active.","use-case-public-sector.b856f541fe":"Pin to decision","use-case-public-sector.311415c16b":"Pull the latest consolidation from the official publisher.","use-case-public-sector.1981cedc5e":"Load statute","use-case-public-sector.9948dcd478":"VERSION CONTROL","use-case-public-sector.df2e72323f":"IN FORCE","use-case-public-sector.014f71d08b":"AMENDMENTS","use-case-public-sector.c901b5aa4c":"CONSOLIDATED","use-case-public-sector.08ca3bad71":"Statutes change. Consolidated versions move with amendments. Every decision Dweve records pins to a specific consolidated version, so the replay reconstructs the exact rule set in force on the date of the decision, not the one current today. The consolidation is pulled from the official publisher, the version active at that moment is recorded with the decision, deterministic compute runs the rule against that version, and years later the same version is pulled and replayed. A statute amended twice since does not change what the decision was, because the text the decision read is still attached to it.","use-case-public-sector.e07addf7a5":"Decisions pin to one version.","use-case-public-sector.7c1266601f":"Statutes amend.","use-case-public-sector.113d9d3ec0":"Statute versions","use-case-public-sector.f5d4349e08":"Full trace","use-case-public-sector.3477f4d91d":"Same answer","use-case-public-sector.17a22df4e0":"Managed Fabric, licensed on your hardware, or air-gapped.","use-case-public-sector.65cfa78989":"Sovereign","use-case-public-sector.e56a362553":"OpenAPI 3.1 spec, typed errors (RFC 7807).","use-case-public-sector.cb885a925a":"REST + gRPC","use-case-public-sector.fedce03c2d":"Source, statute, version, official, signature.","use-case-public-sector.0788e3e212":"Signed packet","use-case-public-sector.6cbcecba9f":"Same input, same output, every machine, every release.","use-case-public-sector.02ae1c41fe":"Exact replay","use-case-public-sector.0753940ae7":"Four properties","use-case-public-sector.06ebfec4be":"WHAT IT GIVES YOU","use-case-public-sector.1327758c2c":"MUNICIPAL","use-case-public-sector.511c78793c":"REGIONAL","use-case-public-sector.f949d8c363":"NATIONAL","use-case-public-sector.c82d1b09cf":"EU","use-case-public-sector.7be01cc4f3":"Every decision pins to one active jurisdiction layer. EU rules apply on top, then national statute, then regional procedure, then municipal bylaw. Each layer is recorded with its version and timestamp, so the replay reconstructs the exact rule set that was in force. The same inputs return the same result on every machine and every release, and the signed packet names the source, the statute, the version, the official and the signature.","use-case-public-sector.b0432ac2b3":"national rules underneath.","use-case-public-sector.8514ddf4a5":"EU rules on top,","use-case-public-sector.70baba3c8a":"The jurisdiction stack","use-case-public-sector.684952cb40":"You do not need a lawyer to challenge a government decision. The packet is in plain\n            language and the statute, the version, and the official are named on the letter.","use-case-public-sector.88b6abdd4a":"Public sector, consumer","use-case-public-sector.c605f28db5":"On the record","use-case-public-sector.2f0314bcf4":"Your case","use-case-public-sector.6afbe8bfb3":"Same packet the court sees.","use-case-public-sector.1c54132b8e":"Record","use-case-public-sector.d538233c6a":"Administrative court, no upfront fee.","use-case-public-sector.65dfd1c042":"Court","use-case-public-sector.3edbd0ad28":"EUR 0","use-case-public-sector.d13722786b":"European + national ombudsman.","use-case-public-sector.2b1e50933f":"Ombudsman","use-case-public-sector.75f527181b":"Free","use-case-public-sector.7851720954":"Free, named reviewer.","use-case-public-sector.e40ae63bae":"Internal review","use-case-public-sector.40b3057221":"6 wk","use-case-public-sector.75e6a088a0":"Four routes","use-case-public-sector.bc3e09058f":"YOUR PATHS","use-case-public-sector.f687646ff3":"COURT","use-case-public-sector.c6c7e910c9":"OMBUDSMAN","use-case-public-sector.ed6912ad70":"REVIEW","use-case-public-sector.4614344b46":"Every decision the platform makes is appealable. The same record the official signed is the record you can challenge. If you disagree with the statute, the version, or the application, the complaint path is on the letter. An internal review by a named reviewer costs nothing, the national and European ombudsman cost nothing, and the administrative court asks no upfront fee. Every one of them reads that same signed record.","use-case-public-sector.573d91c3b3":"can challenge.","use-case-public-sector.3fef2e26bb":"A decision you","use-case-public-sector.e2d8ea01ae":"Your complaint path","use-case-public-sector.a4be8892e9":"You get the same answer the official gets. No more chasing a paragraph through\n            a call centre.","use-case-public-sector.11234a16b5":"One record","use-case-public-sector.88207327fb":"One case","use-case-public-sector.60d7b3a861":"Your appeal path is on the record, with the next step.","use-case-public-sector.d8cb03e330":"Appeal","use-case-public-sector.497b641955":"The official who signed off is named, not anonymous.","use-case-public-sector.89ff31225c":"Owner","use-case-public-sector.4ce11a069e":"The statute and version that fired are attached, not separate.","use-case-public-sector.78e1790e29":"Rule","use-case-public-sector.c871781a2c":"The case was granted, declined, or sent for review with a reason.","use-case-public-sector.92f5fe6952":"Four outcomes","use-case-public-sector.412d2b18f6":"HOW IT WORKS FOR YOU","use-case-public-sector.dfc9ede183":"APPEAL PATH","use-case-public-sector.b838c172bb":"PLAIN LANGUAGE","use-case-public-sector.42b5da9146":"FOI READY","use-case-public-sector.ecb966e2ae":"A FOI request used to mean weeks of reconstruction. With Dweve the reply is a retrieval: the statute, the version, the official, and the appeal path are already attached to the decision. The reply is drafted in plain language. It says whether the case was granted, declined or sent for review and why, the statute and the version that fired travel with it rather than sitting somewhere else, the official who signed is named, and the next step in your appeal path is on the same page.","use-case-public-sector.27e970ad0c":"fully on the record.","use-case-public-sector.c8eb09fe0a":"A FOI reply,","use-case-public-sector.675b849427":"Freedom of information","use-case-public-sector.e2069070de":"Delete means deleted.","use-case-public-sector.993a665d35":"In charge","use-case-public-sector.905cb326c7":"You","use-case-public-sector.4d73d375e8":"Built and run under EU rules.","use-case-public-sector.ef5fdf226f":"Footing","use-case-public-sector.836c239b83":"The statute that decided your case.","use-case-public-sector.8e16e5b2c4":"Real","use-case-public-sector.1641a6eed5":"A reason, not a guess.","use-case-public-sector.89b86ab0e6":"Language","use-case-public-sector.34118050b2":"Plain","use-case-public-sector.96d70f0123":"When your public body runs on Dweve","use-case-public-sector.f31727ff20":"WHAT YOU GET","use-case-public-sector.228abde818":"RIGHT TO APPEAL","use-case-public-sector.3ccba595af":"NAMED OFFICIAL","use-case-public-sector.7e5a1c61bd":"When your public body uses Dweve, the letter you receive is not a guess. It is tied to a statute, a record, and a named official. If you ask why, the answer is in writing, on the record. It names the statute that decided your case and the person who signed it, it is built and run under EU rules, and when you ask for your data to be deleted, it is deleted.","use-case-public-sector.02ee651100":"with reasons attached.","use-case-public-sector.bea6b7765a":"A government letter","use-case-public-sector.194cb83cf6":"Your right to a record","use-case-public-sector.444b6c26fa":"Every FOI reply draws from the same packet as the audit court review and the\n            procurement challenge. One source of truth, three regulatory touchpoints.","use-case-public-sector.d88bff4961":"Public sector, business","use-case-public-sector.c8ba9c7e1d":"One signed reply","use-case-public-sector.90efc21e83":"Four stages","use-case-public-sector.faa999e1ed":"Reply sent in writing, signed by named officer.","use-case-public-sector.6c2bb735a4":"Reply","use-case-public-sector.54aad84c53":"Privilege and third-party data redacted per rule.","use-case-public-sector.e1617abf7d":"Redact","use-case-public-sector.bce5d9a5e0":"Decision packet pulled, not rebuilt from scratch.","use-case-public-sector.eb55f47b49":"Retrieve","use-case-public-sector.7f0718eca8":"Citizen files FOI, request logged in the system.","use-case-public-sector.4aed03cac4":"Request","use-case-public-sector.f4bed26bf1":"FOI WORKFLOW","use-case-public-sector.127edee78d":"SIGNED","use-case-public-sector.e9b1d6f3ff":"FOI is the workflow most damaged by scattered records. Today a single request can take weeks of reconstruction across the DMS, the case file, and the email thread. Dweve pulls the same packet the civil servant signed at decision time, so the reply is a retrieval, not a reconstruction. The packet carries the source, the statute and the consolidated version, the official who signed, and the appeal path, so drafting a reply means reading one file instead of rebuilding the case from the DMS, the case file and an email thread. The version pinned to the decision is the version the reply quotes, so what the requester is told matches what the file holds.","use-case-public-sector.3202526e55":"answered in hours, not weeks.","use-case-public-sector.f25a5a1fcc":"A FOI request","use-case-public-sector.287419884c":"FOI auto-assembly","use-case-public-sector.c5eabdab08":"The decision stays inside your jurisdiction. The platform scales from a single\n            pilot directorate to a full ministry without re-platforming.","use-case-public-sector.36593975d6":"Your jurisdiction","use-case-public-sector.89a702ea7f":"Closed bundle, no outbound check-in. For classified or statutory work.","use-case-public-sector.0fa2d32b9f":"Run on servers in your own building. Same API, same trace format.","use-case-public-sector.0058df0a6e":"Dweve-operated public Mesh; processing boundary documented in the agreement.","use-case-public-sector.7853827da5":"LICENSED","use-case-public-sector.67b752639a":"MANAGED MESH","use-case-public-sector.5dd6fa7b6e":"Three deployment postures, one platform, one API. Managed through Fabric on the public Dweve Mesh on EU-registered infrastructure. Licensed for on-prem in your data centre. Air-gapped for the most sensitive work. Same trace format, same replay packets across all three.","use-case-public-sector.bb6a282853":"Your hardware.","use-case-public-sector.c6e2c14c5a":"Your jurisdiction.","use-case-public-sector.1d197d39c5":"Where it runs","use-case-public-sector.027e5dab3f":"All four gates","use-case-public-sector.907bcb3e89":"DPIA + sovereignty rule evidence compiled per system.","use-case-public-sector.8e0b958add":"BVO-V, VOG, DVTA records linked to staff access.","use-case-public-sector.f25ce1b8a3":"Security","use-case-public-sector.e5b966b153":"Aanbestedingswet categories linked per call-off.","use-case-public-sector.710c85efc7":"National","use-case-public-sector.8c353cbdbc":"MEAT criteria evidenced per tender, not assembled after.","use-case-public-sector.6440286f2f":"WHAT CHANGES THIS TENDER","use-case-public-sector.0a7b77e1bf":"SECURITY","use-case-public-sector.cb9a5a208a":"AANBESTEDINGSWET","use-case-public-sector.a89173c03c":"Procurement is the gate. The Public Procurement Directive, the national aanbestedingswet, security clearance, and the Data Boundary Impact Assessment each have to be satisfied before a single decision runs. Dweve ships the artefacts each framework expects, as the work happens. Each gate reads what the decision packets already carry, so the tender file, the clearance evidence and the impact assessment come out of the same record instead of a separate submission pack assembled for the occasion.","use-case-public-sector.e74e651202":"the rules you already operate under.","use-case-public-sector.679fc74fa5":"A platform that fits","use-case-public-sector.e46d3ec52a":"Procurement posture","use-case-public-sector.5d1cc3c5c6":"Jurisdiction","use-case-public-sector.8a1379821b":"Opaque decisions","use-case-public-sector.f68cece41b":"Trace attached","use-case-public-sector.70653c988e":"Signed packet the audit court can replay in under a minute","use-case-public-sector.4e250b4fde":"REPLAY","use-case-public-sector.163408222c":"Case officer M. El Amrani, timestamp, decision state","use-case-public-sector.501e489055":"OWNER","use-case-public-sector.4b15953fee":"Housing Benefits Act art. 4.3, version 2024-c.7","use-case-public-sector.aaa398a28b":"RULE","use-case-public-sector.2b15fca290":"Application file, income record, household composition","use-case-public-sector.e9ae0ed784":"SOURCE","use-case-public-sector.2a94e9478a":"income-record-BDR-2026-Q2.pdf","use-case-public-sector.63b52c56d2":"Housing Benefits Act article 4.3 (consolidated version 2024-c.7), applied because household income of EUR 48,200 exceeded the statutory threshold of EUR 46,000 on the date of application. The reviewing case officer M. El Amrani confirmed the decline and noted the appeal path. The same decision replays bit-identical, with the statute, the version, and the income calculation on one screen.","use-case-public-sector.7f4a184ece":"THE RECORD SHOWS","use-case-public-sector.ac94e20572":"Why was this housing benefit application declined?","use-case-public-sector.73e3e570d2":"THE COURT ASKS","use-case-public-sector.786a2f2594":"The decision record","use-case-public-sector.fb6ac67b4b":"Every benefits, permit, or inspection decision leaves a signed packet: the source, the statute, the consolidated version, the official, and a bit-exact replay. The court opens one file and watches the same decision come back. Nothing is reconstructed afterwards, because the packet is written while the case is being decided.","use-case-public-sector.b647f10cfd":"The packet the audit court replays in under a minute.","use-case-public-sector.89fca20406":"The decision record is produced as the work happens. The FOI request is a\n              retrieval, not a reconstruction. The audit court sees the same packet the\n              civil servant saw.","use-case-public-sector.43d8b29d50":"Each blocks the audit","use-case-public-sector.ec95d99629":"Four gaps","use-case-public-sector.e10fad6d31":"A chat log does not replay the same way twice.","use-case-public-sector.fade4edeec":"No evidence","use-case-public-sector.a088116795":"Foreign-hosted data fails the public-sector outsourcing rules.","use-case-public-sector.e03947cc0c":"Sovereignty","use-case-public-sector.adcd85d13a":"A score is not a reason a court can read.","use-case-public-sector.8479f2b690":"Black box","use-case-public-sector.c8845da11b":"It invents a rule instead of citing the statute that fired.","use-case-public-sector.a978d8e92c":"Hallucination","use-case-public-sector.782cef5501":"Four structural gaps","use-case-public-sector.7868fe4027":"WHY GENERIC AI FAILS THE AUDIT","use-case-public-sector.a5b7d57a85":"GDPR","use-case-public-sector.7b46d2f3cc":"AI ACT","use-case-public-sector.c2a0b825eb":"A procurement officer does not buy a platform. She survives an FOI request, an audit court review, and a procurement challenge. The EU AI Act, GDPR, the Public Procurement Directive, and national digital sovereignty frameworks each want the same thing: a decision tied to a statute, a consolidated version, and a named official, on hardware that stays inside the jurisdiction.","use-case-public-sector.ebd1db4000":"is a public artefact.","use-case-public-sector.a886743dae":"A government decision","use-case-public-sector.f07aaa9f2d":"The decision register","use-case-public-sector.a4fb970cd2":"See where it runs","use-case-public-sector.14464c4c5a":"Talk to a public-sector engineer","use-case-public-sector.b61263aaad":"Pick one workflow: benefits eligibility, permit review, inspection triage, or constituent correspondence. Run it with your own statutes and watch the public record assemble as the work moves. Managed through Fabric on the public Dweve Mesh, on your hardware, or air-gapped.","use-case-public-sector.a30db7f4f9":"Start with the decision you most dread explaining on the record.","use-case-public-sector.aaa422e2b0":"EECC","use-case-public-sector.1e1aed6b46":"eIDAS","use-case-public-sector.4c7b0b463d":"Public Procurement Directive","use-case-public-sector.d75a4de2ef":"EU AI Act","use-case-public-sector.01b1d2e86e":"Jurisdiction stack","use-case-public-sector.cfdbfc01fc":"Air-gapped by default for the most sensitive work. Signed replay packets per decision. OpenAPI 3.1 surface, managed Mesh or on-prem. No US hyperscaler dependency, no CLOUD Act exposure. Statute-aware: every decision pins to a consolidated version of the rule.","use-case-public-sector.3c1feee154":"Replay every decision.","use-case-public-sector.e107131f4d":"Run in your jurisdiction.","use-case-public-sector.52dd11b4bd":"How a decision works","use-case-public-sector.7a4b408292":"If a public body sends you a decision, you should be able to see the rule, the information used, and who was responsible. Dweve keeps those reasons with the letter, including the route for questions or appeal.","use-case-public-sector.bf23d26d21":"See a decision register","use-case-public-sector.b58283283d":"Run public services with the statute, consolidated version, responsible civil servant, and appeal route attached to every decision. That gives operations, procurement, and oversight one record for FOI requests, audit-court review, and procurement challenges, built and run under EU rules in your jurisdiction.","use-case-public-sector.ea74d0f417":"beside the decision.","use-case-public-sector.7bd9eee516":"Put the rule","use-case-public-sector.11dc9e1952":"Status:","use-case-public-sector.7619bc2b83":"Per DPIA + EU sovereignty rule.","use-case-public-sector.44035cc578":"Data Boundary Impact Assessment","use-case-public-sector.3a87d417dd":"BVO-V, VOG, DVTA where applicable.","use-case-public-sector.563fe5913a":"Security clearance","use-case-public-sector.1ecf912992":"Aanbestedingswet 2012, category 1 services.","use-case-public-sector.532d7a922d":"National framework","use-case-public-sector.79867d606e":"EU 2014/24 framework, MEAT criteria, transparency.","use-case-public-sector.00b322f3e7":"Replay pulls the version that was in force","use-case-public-sector.312a1b250a":"Every decision pins to one consolidated version","use-case-public-sector.110e3c3175":"Housing Benefits Act, NL","use-case-public-sector.db31f04b53":"Statute timeline","use-case-public-sector.410efc82c5":"Pending Royal Assent","use-case-public-sector.5ce5ff62a9":"Current in force","use-case-public-sector.8515aaf40e":"Threshold raise","use-case-public-sector.b3ca35429c":"Original act","use-case-public-sector.53741b6505":"Replay reconstructs the same reply","use-case-public-sector.f2d88968ee":"Signed, on the public record","use-case-public-sector.5aaae2d992":"Administrative review, form OB-12, 6 weeks","use-case-public-sector.e1a476f66b":"APPEAL","use-case-public-sector.d180af2651":"Housing Benefits Act art. 4.3, threshold EUR 46,000","use-case-public-sector.9ada6053d8":"M. El Amrani (named)","use-case-public-sector.4a0c8eab7e":"OFFICER","use-case-public-sector.603eb01674":"12 June 2026","use-case-public-sector.9b08585539":"DECISION DATE","use-case-public-sector.8b043fc8ab":"Your housing benefit application was declined under article 4.3 of the Housing\n          Benefits Act because your household income (EUR 48,200 in 2025) exceeded the\n          statutory threshold of EUR 46,000. The case officer was M. El Amrani. You may\n          request administrative review within six weeks using form OB-12.","use-case-public-sector.e067a15546":"Your FOI reply, in writing","use-case-public-sector.a912d06a61":"EU rules apply on top","use-case-public-sector.c7090f1dea":"Each decision pins to its active layer","use-case-public-sector.165a6702a5":"per decision","use-case-public-sector.417927c497":"Nijmegen bylaw 2023-08","use-case-public-sector.39a525c1bf":"Municipal","use-case-public-sector.56c8077650":"Arnhem branch procedure","use-case-public-sector.a4e69e4a34":"Regional","use-case-public-sector.fb79371411":"Housing Benefits Act 2024-c.7","use-case-public-sector.f7b2d8e87f":"AI Act, GDPR, PPD","use-case-public-sector.2479bc92dd":"Replay pulls the rule + the version together","use-case-public-sector.0cbd6ef1cd":"The same record the officer sees","use-case-public-sector.96632623de":"path open","use-case-public-sector.e7778c984b":"Administrative review within 6 weeks, form OB-12","use-case-public-sector.cef977f494":"M. El Amrani, named case officer","use-case-public-sector.f8c645dc5c":"Belastingdienst income record (verified)","use-case-public-sector.9faec0f5c2":"art. 4.3","use-case-public-sector.7e442759e3":"Income threshold EUR 46,000 for household of 3","use-case-public-sector.af52a1fe0f":"under article 4.3","use-case-public-sector.e2bd52252b":"DECLINED","use-case-public-sector.eddc826b31":"DECISION","use-case-public-sector.f6590400f5":"case 4f9e","use-case-public-sector.a993c6f22d":"Housing benefit application, household of 3, income EUR 48,200","use-case-public-sector.e713d42aa6":"SUBJECT","use-case-public-sector.bf58f74e44":"Decision on the record","use-case-public-sector.808a720182":"PUBLISHED / TRACEABLE / APPEALABLE","use-case-public-sector.738ec8b341":"NL, regional branch Arnhem","use-case-public-sector.eb8d72238c":"JURISDICTION","use-case-public-sector.f42e49b793":"M. El Amrani, case officer","use-case-public-sector.7dd768a817":"Housing Benefits Act, art. 4.3","use-case-public-sector.b239a83c6a":"STATUTE","use-case-public-sector.8ea206fbe5":"Housing benefit, decl. 4f9e","use-case-public-sector.a47a003100":"decision 2026-0184","use-case-public-sector.c8414bdafa":"OFFICIAL GAZETTE","use-case-public-sector.380f063397":"EU AI ACT","use-case-public-sector.42972de55f":"NIS2","use-case-public-sector.1dabba21cd":"✓","use-case-public-sector.fbcec86144":"Business Workspace","use-case-public-sector.87feb88216":"Licensed","use-case-public-sector.c73cc64719":"Air-gap","use-case-public-sector.869360a6f4":"Bit","use-case-public-sector.c8e5998f6a":"API","use-case-public-sector.9170a8b2fb":"EU","use-case-public-sector.2876814bd7":"Integer","use-case-public-sector.adbc560c32":"MPFR","use-case-public-sector.f23ba2a6ee":"proptest","use-case-public-sector.be258ce66f":"0 ULP","use-case-public-sector.5d0b2f6bd4":"OBSERVED","use-case-public-sector.80db3832a5":"OUTCOMES","use-case-public-sector.feb892b2eb":"DEPLOYMENT","use-case-public-sector.84239a06e9":"LIFECYCLE","use-case-public-sector.c86c5cfb68":"CITIZEN","use-case-public-sector.9cebb192fc":"FOI","use-case-public-sector.0ddc335dad":"APPEAL","use-case-public-sector.6f38f66d9a":"PLATFORM","use-case-public-sector.d072aa117d":"WORKFLOW","use-case-public-sector.39bda14904":"EVERY RELEASE","use-case-public-sector.5ce41bc339":"ARCHITECTURE","use-case-public-sector.46b9927e1d":"DETERMINISM","use-case-public-sector.c3bf79e262":"The rule, the version and the named official are one artefact, not three systems.","use-case-public-sector.ca5c160b39":"What the audit court sees","use-case-public-sector.f59d48567d":"Evidence produced at decision time is what survives a review years later.","use-case-public-sector.3acebb2572":"Procurement evidence is a retrieval from work already done, not a separate exercise.","use-case-public-sector.0e6d51dd8b":"The posture changes where the boundary sits. It does not change what is recorded.","use-case-public-sector.a7d82e54d9":"One signed record answers the FOI request, the audit court and the procurement challenge.","use-case-public-sector.5d8b9d9664":"A letter you can check is a letter that still has its reasons attached.","use-case-public-sector.2b46d23571":"A reply that is retrieved rather than rebuilt reaches you in the same words.","use-case-public-sector.262ac3a672":"A decision you can challenge is a decision that kept the reasons it was made on.","use-case-public-sector.dc550f6589":"Every decision names the layer it was made under and the rule set in force.","use-case-public-sector.ac1c153410":"The bound is checked against a reference on every release, not asserted once.","use-case-public-sector.8792580ada":"The trust boundary is declared per operating model, and evidence never leaves it.","use-case-public-sector.ec2d076387":"The tender, the bid, the award and the audit all point at the same packets.","use-case-public-sector.3843ca1aef":"The rules engine you already run keeps running. What changes is the record around it.","use-case-public-sector.bcbfb78d21":"One API surface, three postures, and the same replay packet out of each.","use-case-public-sector.e83ee960e5":"One decision","use-case-public-sector.93b48c8079":"One packet","use-case-public-sector.2eb77d8497":"Every field of the register entry, from subject to appeal route","use-case-public-sector.6e3665d85f":"Signed","use-case-public-sector.b519fbfb5f":"six fields","use-case-public-sector.a6cb323559":"The question put to the record, the answer, and the four lines behind it","use-case-public-sector.17d120d8bb":"Replayable","use-case-public-sector.5c7f123718":"four lines","use-case-public-sector.d1f08fb924":"One file, opened rather than rebuilt","use-case-public-sector.d3d71e0d16":"Four frameworks, one body of evidence","use-case-public-sector.005556d8bb":"The four compliance gates a public tender has to clear, and at what grain each is evidenced","use-case-public-sector.78b45f8fdc":"Evidenced","use-case-public-sector.7c52eb6141":"four gates","use-case-public-sector.23c2159602":"Each artefact is produced as the work happens","use-case-public-sector.21aeb685a6":"What does not change between postures","use-case-public-sector.aef18214b5":"The API, the trace format and the replay packet are the same in all three deployments","use-case-public-sector.733fd2b4c4":"Constant","use-case-public-sector.89ecc13361":"three postures","use-case-public-sector.a2ffe1f1c7":"One platform from a pilot directorate to a full ministry","use-case-public-sector.23b016944b":"One packet, three readers","use-case-public-sector.e19e6ec4c0":"The FOI reply, the audit court review and the procurement challenge all read the same record","use-case-public-sector.01335793c7":"Retrieval","use-case-public-sector.e953a7e7ba":"three readers","use-case-public-sector.47b716baec":"In writing","use-case-public-sector.7b382f8c6d":"four fields","use-case-public-sector.835236f2d8":"The same answer, both sides of the counter","use-case-public-sector.b0974785e1":"What the official sees and what you receive are one record with the same things attached","use-case-public-sector.2e4a1982a0":"Identical","use-case-public-sector.e58efd5f8a":"four attachments","use-case-public-sector.15dc95fd34":"A challenge returns to the same record","use-case-public-sector.ebca71c4cc":"How a complaint moves, from the letter you received back to the record behind it","use-case-public-sector.4d45909516":"Open route","use-case-public-sector.9b064af95c":"four stages","use-case-public-sector.e629ece189":"One active","use-case-public-sector.0b9bd09efe":"four layers","use-case-public-sector.377013e33a":"In force","use-case-public-sector.f65e720be2":"four versions","use-case-public-sector.a8e9a70dc4":"NIS2","use-case-public-sector.c94c39277f":"Bit-exact replay","use-case-public-sector.c1ba4c5ef4":"One file","use-case-public-sector.654207c8a1":"AUTO-ASSEMBLED","use-case-public-sector.a1a27ef897":"CI-GUARDED","use-case-public-sector.d3fd18e683":"BVO-V","use-case-public-sector.7eac05b523":"CPU-NATIVE"}