{"core-extras.96d330537a":"Base IR","core-extras.bee831a169":"Substrate","core-extras.61a0822826":"Apps on Core","core-extras.15438cc098":"not supported","core-extras.ad565d9d01":"Feature","core-extras.0155bf03e5":"Segment legend","core-extras.8b7110078e":"Algorithm groups by data type","core-extras.25ab4276a6":"Scrollable capability matrix","page-breadcrumb.c766e66518":"Breadcrumb","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.title":"Research evidence instrument","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.meta":"Question / evidence / outcome","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.input":"Input","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.output":"Outcome","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.source1":"Direct","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.source1Note":"support","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.source2":"Context","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.source2Note":"scope","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.source3":"Conflict","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.source3Note":"kept","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.core":"Evidence","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.rail1":"Method visible","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.rail2":"Provenance linked","res-idx-hero-glyph.shared.rail3":"Revision ready","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.input1":"A useful","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.input2":"question","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.inputNote1":"What do I need","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.inputNote2":"to know now?","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.output1":"A useful","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.output2":"answer","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.row1":"Reason visible","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.row2":"Limit named","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.row3":"Change tracked","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.consumer.outputFoot":"Confidence within reach","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.input1":"A live","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.input2":"decision","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.inputNote1":"Risk, cost,","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.inputNote2":"operations","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.output1":"A defensible","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.output2":"choice","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.row1":"Risk visible","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.row2":"Cost bounded","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.row3":"Trigger named","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.business.outputFoot":"Decision trail attached","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.input1":"A falsifiable","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.input2":"hypothesis","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.inputNote1":"Expected result","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.inputNote2":"and kill condition","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.output1":"A reproducible","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.output2":"result","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.row1":"Method pinned","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.row2":"Lineage linked","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.row3":"Limits retained","res-idx-hero-glyph.mode.technical.outputFoot":"Ready to challenge","res-index-lab-to-screen.2c88708c97":"What it turns into on your screen","res-index-lab-to-screen.c9debb77fe":"Energy-efficient inference research","res-index-lab-to-screen.ce492805d0":"Deterministic execution research","res-index-lab-to-screen.2d1b7fc270":"Binary vector retrieval research","res-index-lab-to-screen.dfcd3187ac":"Engineers turn the proven idea into real code. The same tests that proved the research now prove the product. You get the benefit without ever reading the paper.","res-index-lab-to-screen.9471c45e54":"We build it into the product.","res-index-lab-to-screen.bbd80cf7e2":"Build","res-index-lab-to-screen.30c258aefc":"Before research becomes a feature, we publish it so others can check our method, our data, and our conclusions. Open scrutiny catches mistakes and makes the work stronger.","res-index-lab-to-screen.735646e7a5":"We publish in the open.","res-index-lab-to-screen.e29a79fe0c":"Review","res-index-lab-to-screen.a84ab9abd8":"We build prototypes, run experiments, and measure the results against real data. If something does not work, we write that down too. A negative result is still a result.","res-index-lab-to-screen.d561ddfac5":"We design and test a fix.","res-index-lab-to-screen.640ab2bae0":"Test","res-index-lab-to-screen.b750003ea6":"Search is too slow. Answers are inconsistent. Energy bills are too high. We turn the thing people complain about into a precise question we can study.","res-index-lab-to-screen.9349163062":"We notice a real problem.","res-index-lab-to-screen.38af51b71a":"Identify","res-index-proof-sheet.d007bb1b85":"Jacquard","res-index-proof-sheet.f97dd52436":"Replay is a testable property under a pinned build","res-index-proof-sheet.1d90e8ba4f":"Proposed 60Hz timestep, seeded randomness, and a typed input-log path","res-index-proof-sheet.e19a805469":"Frame comparison (to validate)","res-index-proof-sheet.3ab11b75ca":"Forge","res-index-proof-sheet.6741916a4b":"Candidate kernels checked against bounded obligations","res-index-proof-sheet.fdb75c49c1":"SMT checks with Z3 and CVC5 plus a Cranelift codegen path; validation pending","res-index-proof-sheet.ce5e2aafea":"Z3 and CVC5","res-index-proof-sheet.a8bafc9d87":"Known optimisation candidate (example)","res-index-proof-sheet.2a4ab30218":"Candidate example: a three-multiply route for complex multiplication","res-index-proof-sheet.6a0e97a759":"Multiplication-count comparison target (not a published benchmark)","res-index-proof-sheet.92a2ec8862":"Mycelia","res-index-proof-sheet.184f1af2b0":"Sparse-dispatch optimisation hypothesis","res-index-proof-sheet.cdf93c7d0a":"Sparse dispatch is proposed to skip inactive cells; per-tick behaviour requires validation","res-index-proof-sheet.4f9cef5bca":"CPU-saving comparison target (not a published result)","res-index-proof-sheet.a5423c7922":"Replay conditions are testable; full reproducibility remains to validate","res-index-proof-sheet.40d376d2b0":"Declared rules are intended to support tick-by-tick replay; validation is pending","res-index-proof-sheet.042eff8ada":"Replay check (to validate)","res-index-proof-sheet.7cca405e22":"Claims scoped for review","res-index-proof-sheet.e32e263303":"Each figure should trace to the source run and measurement record; the evidence status is part of the review.","res-index-proof-sheet.beb2c23792":"Portable targets","res-index-proof-sheet.0ee065e17a":"Forge's candidate backend scope includes x86-64, RISC-V, WebAssembly, and GPU; coverage and quality require validation.","res-index-proof-sheet.2a131e856d":"Access by agreement","res-index-proof-sheet.3361756261":"Jacquard source is private and available by request. Forge remains research and is not open.","res-index-proof-sheet.e2acc492f9":"research evidence (validation status)","res-index-proof-sheet.b3b265951f":"source trace to verify","res-index-proof-sheet.a66a3646f1":"What evidence can support","res-index-proof-sheet.c54a2d4e49":"Claims, evidence, and the number behind each.","res-index-proof-sheet.990e94b7bb":"Reproducibility is a design goal for these research tracks. Each row should pair a candidate claim with\n          the stream, source, and measurement record that produced it. Read it as an evidence sheet\n          with validation status, not as a brochure.","res-index-proof-sheet.df063869e1":"Stream","res-index-proof-sheet.dc4e08a408":"Claim","res-index-proof-sheet.7ea014de7b":"Evidence","res-index-proof-sheet.9550373e8b":"Measured","res-index-proof-sheet.7788ec0a16":"Numbers shown here are report fields or comparison targets; check the source record and access terms before treating one as a measured result.","res-index-research-questions.74056f4507":"Three areas, one mission","res-index-research-questions.268f1fd0f7":"AI is everywhere now, but most people do not know how it works, where their data goes, or\n          whether they can trust the answers. Our research exists to fix that. We work on three\n          problems that matter to everyone who uses technology.","res-index-research-questions.aab3acb671":"Three questions that guide everything we build.","res-index-research-questions.1a30b773b0":"What we research and why","res-index-research-questions.5a0c04c6eb":"plain language","res-index-research-questions.41a314d16f":"Asked before we build anything","res-index-research-questions.c6b38ed500":"three questions","res-index-research-questions.556ffa9689":"Checkable, not take it on faith","res-index-research-questions.46e8afd28c":"We study how to make AI explain its reasoning, give the same answer every time, and say so when it is unsure. You should never have to trust a black box. You should be able to see why it said something and decide for yourself.","res-index-research-questions.987e8fbc77":"Answers you can check.","res-index-research-questions.60747a931a":"Can I believe the answer?","res-index-research-questions.71e9b5c051":"Trustworthy AI","res-index-research-questions.c941f6e072":"Same result, a fraction of the power","res-index-research-questions.1e46630b24":"Running AI can use a lot of power. We look for ways to get the same answer using far less. When AI uses less electricity, it costs less and pollutes less, so smaller organisations and public services can afford it too.","res-index-research-questions.e91b51f365":"AI that respects the grid.","res-index-research-questions.9531aa5609":"Does it waste electricity?","res-index-research-questions.748c3b27e4":"Energy efficiency","res-index-research-questions.c4067a9941":"European servers, European law","res-index-research-questions.5920d04ca2":"We study how to build AI that stores and handles your information inside European borders, under European law. That means it is protected by GDPR, not handed to foreign surveillance, and looked after by people you can hold to account.","res-index-research-questions.ef521e0c6e":"Your data stays in Europe.","res-index-research-questions.b4faefb093":"Where does my data go?","res-index-research-questions.26ef011865":"EU sovereignty","res-index-stream-board.7c897c60c4":"Sovereign, efficient, trustworthy","res-index-stream-board.c31e21869e":"Each stream publishes openly so others can check the work behind the claim.","res-index-stream-board.da0eed8ce4":"Supports","res-index-stream-board.df063869e1":"Stream","res-index-stream-board.30d3384fc5":"Dweve research is organised around four strategic areas that map directly to product\n          capabilities. Each is the public research layer that supports a commercial claim. Hover a\n          stream to see what it underpins.","res-index-stream-board.b77e1aac2c":"Four streams. One mission: sovereign, efficient, trustworthy AI.","res-index-stream-board.71af2e06cd":"Research areas","res-index-stream-board.8f868554b0":"open publications","res-index-stream-board.26f5856663":"4 active streams","res-index-stream-board.0fbd527d42":"Deployment and residency guarantees","res-index-stream-board.3390194ca1":"Research into data-residency frameworks and transfer mechanisms that satisfy Schrems II. This underpins our deployment guarantees that data stays inside European borders, under European law.","res-index-stream-board.a2f3284e23":"Jurisdiction by design.","res-index-stream-board.682abed585":"European data sovereignty","res-index-stream-board.9f37ff9b94":"Mesh federated learning","res-index-stream-board.bc4764fd9f":"Research into homomorphic encryption, secure aggregation for federated training, and zero-knowledge proofs for model verification. This is the foundation under the federated learning inside Mesh, our circular compute product.","res-index-stream-board.2313d9105b":"Collaborate without exposing data.","res-index-stream-board.a76b6e0101":"Privacy-preserving compute","res-index-stream-board.1511f8dd5c":"Cost control and sustainability reporting","res-index-stream-board.efcca467d0":"Research into quantisation and hardware-specific kernel work that cuts the power a model needs without degrading the output. Less electricity means lower running cost and a smaller footprint.","res-index-stream-board.76e67df025":"Lower watts per answer.","res-index-stream-board.a5b1aee2da":"Energy-efficient inference","res-index-stream-board.9b2bc6797b":"Reproducibility and audit guarantees","res-index-stream-board.dbdf735e84":"Research into fixed-point arithmetic, seeded randomness, and platform-independent execution so a model gives the identical answer on every machine. This underpins the reproducibility you need for an audit.","res-index-stream-board.e7ccdea4cd":"Same input, same output, every time.","res-index-stream-board.53ea08c4a8":"Deterministic AI","res-index-stream-console.60a8f7dfe1":"Jacquard / Forge / Mycelia","res-index-stream-console.5e985467e3":"We publish intermediate results, failed experiments, and revised hypotheses. Research as\n          an open engineering process.","res-index-stream-console.0be42ea0e9":"Jacquard remains a private research track. Any transfer to Fabric, Nexus, or Aura requires separate validation.","res-index-stream-console.ef8268e266":"A path into the stack","res-index-stream-console.447dff0dde":"Jacquard replay is a research property, Mycelia replay is a test condition, and Forge checks bounded obligations in an experimental programme.","res-index-stream-console.f7b1735a0e":"Deterministic by design","res-index-stream-console.90d6d29bb6":"Each stream carries an evidence status and a boundary around its current claims.","res-index-stream-console.c314a91c73":"Evidence status, not a product claim","res-index-stream-console.c1e06aabf5":"Open engineering process","res-index-stream-console.0e5210361e":"dweve research show","res-index-stream-console.c873bcc8c3":"RESEARCH","res-index-stream-console.825b742371":"RESEARCH TRACK","res-index-stream-console.8d2b29f85a":"Research streams","res-index-stream-console.91094607e7":"open engineering process","res-index-stream-console.d6faf2ebc8":"3 active streams","res-index-stream-console.a7f48023de":"tick-by-tick replay (research property)","res-index-stream-console.4f9cef5bca":"CPU comparison (validation pending)","res-index-stream-console.5ab2df3157":"sparse dispatch","res-index-stream-console.8f36e8d4b9":"model scopes: perception, chemistry, evolution","res-index-stream-console.932639ee47":"15 domains","res-index-stream-console.ac24419f52":"Research codebase, access by request","res-index-stream-console.b123aaa34c":"A digital-world model with explicit local rules and energy costs. The report supports deterministic replay as a testable property; broader behaviour claims remain future validation work.","res-index-stream-console.0e87e42f5a":"Artificial life and emergence","res-index-stream-console.92a2ec8862":"Mycelia","res-index-stream-console.f9174298f9":"Worked example (measurement pending)","res-index-stream-console.b534f39377":"worked example","res-index-stream-console.bc2c8692cc":"Target backends (evaluation scope)","res-index-stream-console.cb874cb2db":"SMT: Z3 and CVC5","res-index-stream-console.c95fa598e1":"Cranelift JIT","res-index-stream-console.9ba8822950":"Partner research, no public release","res-index-stream-console.0d85c9089f":"Forge explores candidate kernel implementations through program synthesis. Its design uses Cranelift-based measurement and SMT checks for bounded obligations; the 2025 report does not establish production readiness or benchmark performance.","res-index-stream-console.2a053c95dd":"Program synthesis for kernels","res-index-stream-console.3ab11b75ca":"Forge","res-index-stream-console.49f01210ac":"Related product contexts","res-index-stream-console.2f1e17b1b2":"research context","res-index-stream-console.0fa06622ce":"15 categories, MCP","res-index-stream-console.6bd4d2e851":"fixed 60Hz","res-index-stream-console.393d8204e0":"timestep","res-index-stream-console.329d50808f":"Private source repository, access by request","res-index-stream-console.d882ef1800":"A browser-based world engine that agents can build through a typed MCP surface. Fixed timestep, seeded randomness, and replay from a seed and input log are research properties to evaluate. The source repository is private.","res-index-stream-console.fcd06eac75":"Deterministic world engine","res-index-stream-console.d007bb1b85":"Jacquard","research-index.next.technical.hero.eyebrow":"Dweve Research","research-index.next.technical.hero.lead":"Build the instrument","research-index.next.technical.hero.accent":"record the mechanism","research-index.next.technical.hero.tail":"keep the limits executable","research-index.next.technical.hero.body":"Our research programmes turn difficult systems questions into inspectable apparatus: deterministic worlds, synthesis pipelines, and artificial-life laboratories. The output is not a demo alone, but a route another engineer can reproduce and challenge.","research-index.next.technical.hero.primary":"Inspect the programmes","research-index.next.technical.hero.secondary":"Read the papers","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.eyebrow":"The active programme stack","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.lead":"Three mechanisms","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.accent":"built to be inspected","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.body":"Jacquard studies deterministic world semantics, Forge studies program synthesis, and Mycelia studies artificial life. Each programme has its own apparatus, result type, and failure boundary.","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.tag1":"Deterministic state","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.tag2":"Measured search","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.tag3":"Structured evidence","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.footer":"Open the implementation story behind each programme","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.sideLabel":"Programme registry","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.sideTitle":"Separate systems, compatible method","research-index.next.technical.portfolio.sideFoot":"Each programme owns its state and evidence","research-index.next.technical.programme.jacquard":"A typed world engine with fixed-step execution, explicit transitions, and replayable agent traces.","research-index.next.technical.programme.forge":"A synthesis pipeline that searches candidate programs, lowers them through Cranelift, measures them, and checks bounded correctness obligations.","research-index.next.technical.programme.mycelia":"A deterministic artificial-life laboratory for local rules, resource pressure, lineage, and emergent structure. Its runs remain research evidence, not a scientific conclusion by themselves.","research-index.next.technical.question.eyebrow":"Specify before instrumenting","research-index.next.technical.question.lead":"Make the unknown","research-index.next.technical.question.accent":"small enough to falsify","research-index.next.technical.question.body":"A programme starts with an observable claim, controlled variables, perturbations, and a stop condition. The specification determines the state we retain and the counterexample that can reopen the result.","research-index.next.technical.question.tag1":"Observable claim","research-index.next.technical.question.tag2":"Controlled state","research-index.next.technical.question.tag3":"Counterexample path","research-index.next.technical.question.footer":"The experiment contract precedes the implementation","research-index.next.technical.question.sideLabel":"Experiment contract","research-index.next.technical.question.sideTitle":"Four fields before code","research-index.next.technical.question.sideFoot":"Unspecified state cannot support a reproducible claim","research-index.next.technical.question.criterion1":"Observable state transition","research-index.next.technical.question.criterion2":"Controlled initial conditions","research-index.next.technical.question.criterion3":"Named perturbation set","research-index.next.technical.question.criterion4":"Executable stop condition","research-index.next.technical.question.promptLabel":"Research contract","research-index.next.technical.question.prompt":"Does the mechanism preserve its invariant across controlled perturbations","research-index.next.technical.question.promptBody":"The invariant, perturbation family, and observation boundary are committed before the run.","research-index.next.technical.question.lane1":"State space","research-index.next.technical.question.lane1Body":"Typed entities, transitions, clocks, and seeds.","research-index.next.technical.question.lane1State":"Versioned","research-index.next.technical.question.lane2":"Perturbations","research-index.next.technical.question.lane2Body":"Cases vary independently against a fixed baseline.","research-index.next.technical.question.lane2State":"Enumerated","research-index.next.technical.question.lane3":"Acceptance","research-index.next.technical.question.lane3Body":"Invariants and failure thresholds run as checks.","research-index.next.technical.question.lane3State":"Executable","research-index.next.technical.question.boundary":"No inference outside the versioned state space","research-index.next.technical.method.eyebrow":"Instrumented end to end","research-index.next.technical.method.lead":"Every gate emits","research-index.next.technical.method.accent":"an inspectable artifact","research-index.next.technical.method.body":"Question, apparatus, run, challenge, and transfer are connected by versioned inputs and outputs. Select a gate to inspect the contract at that boundary.","research-index.next.technical.method.tag1":"Typed inputs","research-index.next.technical.method.tag2":"Recorded events","research-index.next.technical.method.tag3":"Executable checks","research-index.next.technical.method.footer":"Five gates, no invisible state","research-index.next.technical.method.sideLabel":"Artifact route","research-index.next.technical.method.sideTitle":"Question to qualified handoff","research-index.next.technical.method.sideFoot":"Every edge can be replayed or rejected","research-index.next.technical.method.inspectorLabel":"Gate contract","research-index.next.technical.method.stage1":"Define the invariant, observation surface, controlled state, perturbation family, and stop rule.","research-index.next.technical.method.stage2":"Implement the minimal deterministic apparatus with explicit clocks, seeds, schemas, and event boundaries.","research-index.next.technical.method.stage3":"Execute the protocol while retaining inputs, transitions, timings, outputs, and environment identity.","research-index.next.technical.method.stage4":"Generate counterexamples across seeds, edge cases, scale, and altered assumptions; attach failures to the result.","research-index.next.technical.method.stage5":"Export the surviving mechanism, API boundary, reproduction packet, and operational constraints as one handoff.","research-index.next.technical.receipt.eyebrow":"Reproduction is an artifact","research-index.next.technical.receipt.lead":"A result is a graph","research-index.next.technical.receipt.accent":"not a screenshot","research-index.next.technical.receipt.body":"The receipt binds source revision, build identity, protocol, state, observations, checks, and limits. A second engineer can recover the route without guessing which environment made it work.","research-index.next.technical.receipt.tag1":"Source pinned","research-index.next.technical.receipt.tag2":"Events retained","research-index.next.technical.receipt.tag3":"Limits queryable","research-index.next.technical.receipt.footer":"The full run remains addressable","research-index.next.technical.receipt.sideLabel":"Receipt registry","research-index.next.technical.receipt.sideTitle":"Identity before interpretation","research-index.next.technical.receipt.sideFoot":"A result without its environment is incomplete","research-index.next.technical.receipt.key1":"Revision","research-index.next.technical.receipt.value1":"Source recorded","research-index.next.technical.receipt.key2":"Seed","research-index.next.technical.receipt.value2":"Run recorded","research-index.next.technical.receipt.key3":"Protocol","research-index.next.technical.receipt.value3":"Protocol versioned","research-index.next.technical.receipt.key4":"Runtime","research-index.next.technical.receipt.value4":"CPU local","research-index.next.technical.receipt.programme":"Jacquard / deterministic run","research-index.next.technical.receipt.state":"Reproduced","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column1":"Inputs","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column1Row1":"World schema pinned","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column1Row2":"Seed and tick rate fixed","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column1Row3":"Agent policy hashed","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column2":"Trace","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column2Row1":"Transitions sequenced","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column2Row2":"Decisions attributed","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column2Row3":"Timing retained","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column3":"Checks","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column3Row1":"Replay hash matched","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column3Row2":"Perturbations executed","research-index.next.technical.receipt.column3Row3":"Failure envelope stored","research-index.next.technical.receipt.replay":"revision + seed + protocol → identical trace hash","research-index.next.technical.receipt.limit":"Qualified for this schema and runtime","research-index.next.technical.transfer.eyebrow":"Export the mechanism","research-index.next.technical.transfer.lead":"Transfer the contract","research-index.next.technical.transfer.accent":"with the capability","research-index.next.technical.transfer.body":"A research result crosses into product engineering only with an explicit interface, reproducible behaviour, benchmark context, and a failure mode the destination can operate.","research-index.next.technical.transfer.tag1":"Interface typed","research-index.next.technical.transfer.tag2":"Benchmark retained","research-index.next.technical.transfer.tag3":"Failure operable","research-index.next.technical.transfer.footer":"The ledger distinguishes a result from an integration","research-index.next.technical.transfer.sideLabel":"Engineering gates","research-index.next.technical.transfer.sideTitle":"Four artifacts cross together","research-index.next.technical.transfer.sideFoot":"Capability, contract, evidence, envelope","research-index.next.technical.transfer.gate1":"Stable interface and state model","research-index.next.technical.transfer.gate2":"Reproduction packet and benchmark","research-index.next.technical.transfer.gate3":"Observable failure and fallback","research-index.next.technical.transfer.jacquardGate":"Trace contract stabilises","research-index.next.technical.transfer.jacquardDestination":"Agent runtime semantics","research-index.next.technical.transfer.forgeGate":"Search cost stays bounded","research-index.next.technical.transfer.forgeDestination":"Synthesis toolchain","research-index.next.technical.transfer.myceliaGate":"Emergence remains observable","research-index.next.technical.transfer.myceliaDestination":"Adaptive system primitives","research-index.next.technical.explore.eyebrow":"Enter at the mechanism","research-index.next.technical.explore.lead":"Inspect the systems","research-index.next.technical.explore.accent":"behind the research claims","research-index.next.technical.explore.body":"Each programme carries its own architecture, apparatus, and result shape. The paper shelf provides the longer theoretical and empirical context around those systems.","research-index.next.technical.explore.tag1":"Architecture","research-index.next.technical.explore.tag2":"Protocols","research-index.next.technical.explore.tag3":"Evidence","research-index.next.technical.explore.footer":"Follow code-shaped questions into their programme","research-index.next.technical.explore.sideLabel":"Technical index","research-index.next.technical.explore.sideTitle":"Three systems and their records","research-index.next.technical.explore.sideFoot":"Programme details first, cross-cutting papers beside them","research-index.next.technical.explore.jacquard":"Inspect typed worlds, deterministic ticks, transitions, and replay traces.","research-index.next.technical.explore.forge":"Inspect candidate generation, lowering, measurement, and solver-backed constraints.","research-index.next.technical.explore.mycelia":"Inspect local rules, lineage, scarcity, and deterministic emergence.","research-index.next.technical.explore.papersTitle":"Read the cross-cutting technical arguments","research-index.next.technical.explore.papersBody":"Long-form work connects deterministic execution, neurosymbolic methods, representation, efficiency, and evidence architecture.","research-index.next.technical.close.eyebrow":"Inspect a complete apparatus","research-index.next.technical.close.title":"Start with Jacquard's deterministic world","research-index.next.technical.close.body":"Follow the state model, fixed-step execution, and replay boundary before moving across the rest of the programme stack.","research-index.next.technical.close.primary":"Read the research","research-index.next.technical.close.secondary":"Open Jacquard","research-index.next.business.hero.eyebrow":"Dweve Research","research-index.next.business.hero.lead":"Turn uncertain capability","research-index.next.business.hero.accent":"into an accountable decision","research-index.next.business.hero.tail":"before it becomes cost","research-index.next.business.hero.body":"Dweve Research separates promising mechanisms from expensive assumptions. Each programme starts with a bounded operational question, records what survives testing, and shows what would have to be true before a result can move into practice.","research-index.next.business.hero.primary":"Map the portfolio","research-index.next.business.hero.secondary":"Inspect the evidence","research-index.next.business.portfolio.eyebrow":"Three programmes, three operating questions","research-index.next.business.portfolio.lead":"Fund the unknowns","research-index.next.business.portfolio.accent":"that can change the system","research-index.next.business.portfolio.body":"The portfolio investigates deterministic worlds, program synthesis, and emergent coordination. Together they target control, engineering leverage, and adaptability rather than novelty for its own sake.","research-index.next.business.portfolio.tag1":"Cost exposed","research-index.next.business.portfolio.tag2":"Risk bounded","research-index.next.business.portfolio.tag3":"Value gated","research-index.next.business.portfolio.footer":"A portfolio organised by operating leverage","research-index.next.business.portfolio.sideLabel":"Portfolio lens","research-index.next.business.portfolio.sideTitle":"Each programme carries one decision","research-index.next.business.portfolio.sideFoot":"Open the programme behind any line","research-index.next.business.programme.jacquard":"Tests whether agent behaviour can stay deterministic, replayable, and suitable for governed operations.","research-index.next.business.programme.forge":"Measures whether program search can reduce engineering effort without creating an unaccountable black box.","research-index.next.business.programme.mycelia":"Studies distributed adaptation where coordination must emerge without a central bottleneck.","research-index.next.business.question.eyebrow":"Define the investment case","research-index.next.business.question.lead":"One decision","research-index.next.business.question.accent":"with a visible chain","research-index.next.business.question.body":"A research programme is bounded by the decision it may inform. We name the operational pressure, the cost of being wrong, the comparison, and the threshold that would justify another step.","research-index.next.business.question.tag1":"Decision owner","research-index.next.business.question.tag2":"Comparison fixed","research-index.next.business.question.tag3":"Stop rule named","research-index.next.business.question.footer":"The question states why the work exists","research-index.next.business.question.sideLabel":"Decision brief","research-index.next.business.question.sideTitle":"Evidence before commitment","research-index.next.business.question.sideFoot":"If no decision changes, the programme stops","research-index.next.business.question.criterion1":"A real operating pressure","research-index.next.business.question.criterion2":"A comparable baseline","research-index.next.business.question.criterion3":"A measurable consequence","research-index.next.business.question.criterion4":"A named decision owner","research-index.next.business.question.promptLabel":"Portfolio question","research-index.next.business.question.prompt":"Can this mechanism improve control or cost enough to merit transfer","research-index.next.business.question.promptBody":"Technical interest opens the inquiry; an accountable operating decision keeps it funded.","research-index.next.business.question.lane1":"Value at stake","research-index.next.business.question.lane1Body":"Time, compute, control, or portability must move.","research-index.next.business.question.lane1State":"Named","research-index.next.business.question.lane2":"Cost of error","research-index.next.business.question.lane2Body":"False confidence and failed transfer are priced in.","research-index.next.business.question.lane2State":"Bounded","research-index.next.business.question.lane3":"Decision threshold","research-index.next.business.question.lane3Body":"The next investment has an explicit evidence gate.","research-index.next.business.question.lane3State":"Agreed","research-index.next.business.question.boundary":"No business case beyond the measured mechanism","research-index.next.business.method.eyebrow":"A governed research route","research-index.next.business.method.lead":"Five gates keep","research-index.next.business.method.accent":"curiosity connected to value","research-index.next.business.method.body":"The method makes spend, evidence, challenge, and handoff visible. A programme can be continued, narrowed, or stopped without pretending that every interesting result deserves a product roadmap.","research-index.next.business.method.tag1":"Stage gates","research-index.next.business.method.tag2":"Evidence owners","research-index.next.business.method.tag3":"Stop conditions","research-index.next.business.method.footer":"Select a gate to see the decision it protects","research-index.next.business.method.sideLabel":"Governance route","research-index.next.business.method.sideTitle":"Spend follows evidence","research-index.next.business.method.sideFoot":"The next gate must be earned","research-index.next.business.method.inspectorLabel":"Operating meaning","research-index.next.business.method.stage1":"Tie the unknown to an operating decision, a baseline, and the cost of making the wrong call.","research-index.next.business.method.stage2":"Build the least expensive instrument that can distinguish a mechanism from a persuasive demonstration.","research-index.next.business.method.stage3":"Run under recorded conditions so time, compute, quality, and exceptions can be compared.","research-index.next.business.method.stage4":"Attack the favourable result and surface the point where the investment case no longer holds.","research-index.next.business.method.stage5":"Hand off only the qualified capability, its operating requirement, and its remaining liability.","research-index.next.business.receipt.eyebrow":"The decision packet","research-index.next.business.receipt.lead":"One choice","research-index.next.business.receipt.accent":"one visible chain","research-index.next.business.receipt.body":"The receipt brings the business question, measured route, transfer criteria, and known limit into one record. It gives finance, operations, and technical owners the same object to challenge.","research-index.next.business.receipt.tag1":"Shared record","research-index.next.business.receipt.tag2":"Measured route","research-index.next.business.receipt.tag3":"Limit retained","research-index.next.business.receipt.footer":"A decision can be reopened without restarting the story","research-index.next.business.receipt.sideLabel":"Decision state","research-index.next.business.receipt.sideTitle":"What leadership needs to see","research-index.next.business.receipt.sideFoot":"A concise record with inspectable depth","research-index.next.business.receipt.key1":"Baseline","research-index.next.business.receipt.value1":"Attached","research-index.next.business.receipt.key2":"Spend","research-index.next.business.receipt.value2":"Traceable","research-index.next.business.receipt.key3":"Gate","research-index.next.business.receipt.value3":"Passed","research-index.next.business.receipt.key4":"Exposure","research-index.next.business.receipt.value4":"Bounded","research-index.next.business.receipt.programme":"Forge synthesis run","research-index.next.business.receipt.state":"Gate review","research-index.next.business.receipt.column1":"Case","research-index.next.business.receipt.column1Row1":"Operating pressure named","research-index.next.business.receipt.column1Row2":"Baseline cost retained","research-index.next.business.receipt.column1Row3":"Owner assigned","research-index.next.business.receipt.column2":"Evidence","research-index.next.business.receipt.column2Row1":"Run conditions recorded","research-index.next.business.receipt.column2Row2":"Result compared","research-index.next.business.receipt.column2Row3":"Exceptions counted","research-index.next.business.receipt.column3":"Decision","research-index.next.business.receipt.column3Row1":"Threshold reviewed","research-index.next.business.receipt.column3Row2":"Transfer cost included","research-index.next.business.receipt.column3Row3":"Residual risk accepted","research-index.next.business.receipt.replay":"Every material number leads back to a recorded run","research-index.next.business.receipt.limit":"Promising mechanism, qualified case","research-index.next.business.transfer.eyebrow":"Move evidence, not enthusiasm","research-index.next.business.transfer.lead":"A result crosses","research-index.next.business.transfer.accent":"only when operations can carry it","research-index.next.business.transfer.body":"Transfer asks what the capability changes, what it costs to own, who operates it, and how failure is contained. Research value becomes business value only after those obligations are visible.","research-index.next.business.transfer.tag1":"Owner ready","research-index.next.business.transfer.tag2":"Cost visible","research-index.next.business.transfer.tag3":"Failure bounded","research-index.next.business.transfer.footer":"The ledger keeps research and product claims separate","research-index.next.business.transfer.sideLabel":"Transfer gate","research-index.next.business.transfer.sideTitle":"Capability with obligations","research-index.next.business.transfer.sideFoot":"The destination accepts the whole packet","research-index.next.business.transfer.gate1":"A material operating gain","research-index.next.business.transfer.gate2":"A viable ownership model","research-index.next.business.transfer.gate3":"A containable failure path","research-index.next.business.transfer.jacquardGate":"Replay supports governance","research-index.next.business.transfer.jacquardDestination":"Controlled agent operations","research-index.next.business.transfer.forgeGate":"Effort gain survives review","research-index.next.business.transfer.forgeDestination":"Engineering acceleration","research-index.next.business.transfer.myceliaGate":"Coordination remains steerable","research-index.next.business.transfer.myceliaDestination":"Distributed operations","research-index.next.business.explore.eyebrow":"Inspect the portfolio","research-index.next.business.explore.lead":"Follow the evidence","research-index.next.business.explore.accent":"behind the operating claim","research-index.next.business.explore.body":"Programme pages expose the mechanism and research route. Papers carry the longer arguments. Use both to tell an interesting possibility apart from one ready to enter an operating plan.","research-index.next.business.explore.tag1":"Programme evidence","research-index.next.business.explore.tag2":"Transfer criteria","research-index.next.business.explore.tag3":"Long-form analysis","research-index.next.business.explore.footer":"Read by mechanism or by decision","research-index.next.business.explore.sideLabel":"Portfolio access","research-index.next.business.explore.sideTitle":"From summary to evidence","research-index.next.business.explore.sideFoot":"Keep the programme and the business case distinct","research-index.next.business.explore.jacquard":"Assess deterministic replay as an operating control for agent worlds.","research-index.next.business.explore.forge":"Inspect the measured route from synthesis search to a qualified program.","research-index.next.business.explore.mycelia":"Study distributed adaptation without assuming central coordination.","research-index.next.business.explore.papersTitle":"Build the case from the longer record","research-index.next.business.explore.papersBody":"Papers connect architecture, economics, control, and limitations for decisions that need more than a summary.","research-index.next.business.close.eyebrow":"Bring a decision","research-index.next.business.close.title":"Start with the unknown that changes your operating model","research-index.next.business.close.body":"Dweve can help bound the question before a promising technology turns into an unowned commitment.","research-index.next.business.close.primary":"Discuss the question","research-index.next.business.close.secondary":"Start with Jacquard","research-index.next.consumer.hero.eyebrow":"Dweve Research","research-index.next.consumer.hero.lead":"Before something feels simple","research-index.next.consumer.hero.accent":"we make the hard parts visible","research-index.next.consumer.hero.tail":"and test them","research-index.next.consumer.hero.body":"The tools you meet through Fabric should not ask you to trust a hidden leap. Our research explores how systems reason, adapt, compress, and replay so useful behaviour can arrive with an explanation close by.","research-index.next.consumer.hero.primary":"See the programmes","research-index.next.consumer.hero.secondary":"Read the evidence","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.eyebrow":"Three questions, three instruments","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.lead":"Research you can","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.accent":"recognise in the experience","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.body":"Each programme studies a different difficult behaviour: worlds that replay, programs that can be searched, and living patterns that emerge from simple local rules.","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.tag1":"Clear behaviour","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.tag2":"Visible limits","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.tag3":"Useful outcomes","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.footer":"Three routes into one more understandable workspace","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.sideLabel":"The portfolio","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.sideTitle":"Different questions, shared discipline","research-index.next.consumer.portfolio.sideFoot":"Open any programme for the complete story","research-index.next.consumer.programme.jacquard":"Tests whether a changing world can stay predictable enough to replay and explain.","research-index.next.consumer.programme.forge":"Studies how a system can search for a working program and show why that candidate survived.","research-index.next.consumer.programme.mycelia":"Explores how rich collective behaviour can grow from small local rules without a hidden director.","research-index.next.consumer.question.eyebrow":"Start with the useful unknown","research-index.next.consumer.question.lead":"A good answer begins","research-index.next.consumer.question.accent":"with a smaller question","research-index.next.consumer.question.body":"We name what someone needs to understand, what must remain fixed, and what would change the answer. That boundary keeps a demonstration from quietly becoming a promise.","research-index.next.consumer.question.tag1":"Need named","research-index.next.consumer.question.tag2":"Context held","research-index.next.consumer.question.tag3":"Limits visible","research-index.next.consumer.question.footer":"The boundary travels with the answer","research-index.next.consumer.question.sideLabel":"Question test","research-index.next.consumer.question.sideTitle":"Useful before impressive","research-index.next.consumer.question.sideFoot":"If the boundary moves, the result reopens","research-index.next.consumer.question.criterion1":"A person can recognise the need","research-index.next.consumer.question.criterion2":"The conditions can be repeated","research-index.next.consumer.question.criterion3":"Failure changes the conclusion","research-index.next.consumer.question.criterion4":"The result can be explained plainly","research-index.next.consumer.question.promptLabel":"Working question","research-index.next.consumer.question.prompt":"Can this behaviour stay understandable when the situation changes","research-index.next.consumer.question.promptBody":"The question is useful only when both the behaviour and the change can be observed.","research-index.next.consumer.question.lane1":"What stays fixed","research-index.next.consumer.question.lane1Body":"The goal, starting state, and comparison remain stable.","research-index.next.consumer.question.lane1State":"Controlled","research-index.next.consumer.question.lane2":"What may change","research-index.next.consumer.question.lane2Body":"Cases, seeds, and pressure vary one at a time.","research-index.next.consumer.question.lane2State":"Explored","research-index.next.consumer.question.lane3":"What would count","research-index.next.consumer.question.lane3Body":"A result must be visible, repeatable, and bounded.","research-index.next.consumer.question.lane3State":"Agreed first","research-index.next.consumer.question.boundary":"No claim beyond the tested situation","research-index.next.consumer.method.eyebrow":"A method you can follow","research-index.next.consumer.method.lead":"Five gates between","research-index.next.consumer.method.accent":"an idea and an answer","research-index.next.consumer.method.body":"The sequence is intentionally legible. Frame the need, build the instrument, run it under known conditions, challenge the result, and transfer only the part that remains useful.","research-index.next.consumer.method.tag1":"Followable","research-index.next.consumer.method.tag2":"Challengeable","research-index.next.consumer.method.tag3":"Replayable","research-index.next.consumer.method.footer":"Tap a stage to inspect what changes hands","research-index.next.consumer.method.sideLabel":"Method route","research-index.next.consumer.method.sideTitle":"No invisible leap","research-index.next.consumer.method.sideFoot":"Each gate leaves something another person can inspect","research-index.next.consumer.method.inspectorLabel":"What this means in practice","research-index.next.consumer.method.stage1":"Turn a broad wish into one question whose answer would genuinely help someone.","research-index.next.consumer.method.stage2":"Build a small, inspectable setting where the behaviour can be seen without surrounding noise.","research-index.next.consumer.method.stage3":"Run the same route under recorded conditions and keep the consequential events.","research-index.next.consumer.method.stage4":"Change the awkward cases on purpose and retain the point where confidence stops.","research-index.next.consumer.method.stage5":"Bring the surviving behaviour into a practical experience without hiding its boundary.","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.eyebrow":"The answer keeps its trail","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.lead":"See what happened","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.accent":"without reading a laboratory notebook","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.body":"A compact receipt connects the starting question, the run, the checks, and the known limit. It makes an outcome easier to trust because the route is still there.","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.tag1":"Readable trail","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.tag2":"Known limit","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.tag3":"Repeatable route","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.footer":"Confidence comes with a route back","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.sideLabel":"Result record","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.sideTitle":"The useful facts at a glance","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.sideFoot":"Enough detail to ask the next question","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.key1":"Question","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.value1":"Bounded","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.key2":"Conditions","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.value2":"Recorded","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.key3":"Checks","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.value3":"Passed","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.key4":"Limit","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.value4":"Attached","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.programme":"Jacquard world run","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.state":"Reproduced","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column1":"Starting point","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column1Row1":"World and goal named","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column1Row2":"Starting state retained","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column1Row3":"Allowed changes listed","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column2":"What happened","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column2Row1":"Every step recorded","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column2Row2":"Decision points preserved","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column2Row3":"Outcome compared","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column3":"What remains true","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column3Row1":"Same start replays","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column3Row2":"Changed cases are marked","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.column3Row3":"Limit stays visible","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.replay":"The route can be followed from start to result","research-index.next.consumer.receipt.limit":"Useful here, not everywhere","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.eyebrow":"From experiment to experience","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.lead":"Research earns its place","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.accent":"one behaviour at a time","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.body":"A promising result does not automatically become a feature. It crosses only when the benefit is clear, the behaviour remains understandable, and the failure mode can be handled in the product.","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.tag1":"Benefit first","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.tag2":"Failure handled","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.tag3":"Boundary retained","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.footer":"A result becomes useful only after the handoff survives","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.sideLabel":"Handoff checks","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.sideTitle":"Three reasons to cross","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.sideFoot":"No gate, no product promise","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.gate1":"People notice the benefit","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.gate2":"The behaviour remains legible","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.gate3":"The edge cases have somewhere to go","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.jacquardGate":"Replay remains understandable","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.jacquardDestination":"Guided work in Fabric","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.forgeGate":"Candidate can be explained","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.forgeDestination":"Assisted building tools","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.myceliaGate":"Patterns remain bounded","research-index.next.consumer.transfer.myceliaDestination":"Adaptive coordination","research-index.next.consumer.explore.eyebrow":"Go closer to the work","research-index.next.consumer.explore.lead":"Choose the question","research-index.next.consumer.explore.accent":"that interests you","research-index.next.consumer.explore.body":"Each programme page explains the mechanism in its own terms. The paper shelf carries longer arguments, while this overview keeps the relationships between the programmes visible.","research-index.next.consumer.explore.tag1":"Programme stories","research-index.next.consumer.explore.tag2":"Working systems","research-index.next.consumer.explore.tag3":"Long-form evidence","research-index.next.consumer.explore.footer":"Three programmes, one evidence shelf","research-index.next.consumer.explore.sideLabel":"Reading map","research-index.next.consumer.explore.sideTitle":"Start broad or go deep","research-index.next.consumer.explore.sideFoot":"Every route keeps the question in view","research-index.next.consumer.explore.jacquard":"Enter a world where every consequential step can be replayed.","research-index.next.consumer.explore.forge":"Follow the search from a need to a measured program candidate.","research-index.next.consumer.explore.mycelia":"Watch local choices accumulate into larger living patterns.","research-index.next.consumer.explore.papersTitle":"Read the arguments behind the work","research-index.next.consumer.explore.papersBody":"Longer papers connect methods, limits, and implications without compressing them into a product claim.","research-index.next.consumer.close.eyebrow":"Continue with a programme","research-index.next.consumer.close.title":"Start with the world you can replay","research-index.next.consumer.close.body":"Jacquard is the clearest first look at how Dweve turns a difficult research question into something visible and inspectable.","research-index.next.consumer.close.primary":"Explore Jacquard","research-index.next.consumer.close.secondary":"Open Jacquard directly","research-index.next.shared.portfolioTitle":"Research programme atlas","research-index.next.shared.threeProgrammes":"Three active programmes","research-index.next.shared.portfolioFootLeft":"Questions before claims","research-index.next.shared.portfolioFootRight":"Open each programme","research-index.next.shared.output":"Working output","research-index.next.shared.questionTitle":"Question boundary","research-index.next.shared.boundBeforeBuild":"Bound before build","research-index.next.shared.questionFootLeft":"Scope is part of the result","research-index.next.shared.questionFootRight":"No moving goalposts","research-index.next.shared.boundary":"Boundary","research-index.next.shared.methodTitle":"Research method bench","research-index.next.shared.fiveGates":"Five visible gates","research-index.next.shared.methodFootLeft":"Every handoff leaves evidence","research-index.next.shared.methodFootRight":"Select a stage","research-index.next.shared.methodTabs":"Research method stages","research-index.next.shared.input":"Input","research-index.next.shared.receiptTitle":"Reproduction receipt","research-index.next.shared.replayable":"Replayable record","research-index.next.shared.receiptFootLeft":"Same inputs, visible route","research-index.next.shared.receiptFootRight":"Limits stay attached","research-index.next.shared.receiptId":"Receipt","research-index.next.shared.programme":"Programme","research-index.next.shared.state":"State","research-index.next.shared.transferTitle":"Transfer ledger","research-index.next.shared.researchToProduct":"Research to practice","research-index.next.shared.transferFootLeft":"Useful results cross a gate","research-index.next.shared.transferFootRight":"No automatic product claims","research-index.next.shared.result":"Result","research-index.next.shared.transferGate":"Transfer gate","research-index.next.shared.destination":"Possible destination","research-index.next.shared.programmes":"Programmes","research-index.next.shared.paperShelf":"Paper shelf","research-index.next.shared.researchRoute":"Research route","research-index.next.shared.exploreTitle":"Evidence shelf","research-index.next.shared.activeWork":"Active work","research-index.next.shared.exploreFootLeft":"Methods, records, and working systems","research-index.next.shared.exploreFootRight":"Read the work","research-index.next.programme.jacquard.field":"Deterministic agent worlds","research-index.next.programme.jacquard.output":"Replayable world engine","research-index.next.programme.forge.field":"Program synthesis","research-index.next.programme.forge.output":"Measured search pipeline","research-index.next.programme.mycelia.field":"Artificial life","research-index.next.programme.mycelia.output":"Emergence laboratory","research-index.next.method.stage1.title":"Frame","research-index.next.method.stage1.short":"Question","research-index.next.method.stage1.summary":"Name the claim and its boundary before choosing a method","research-index.next.method.stage1.input":"A useful unknown","research-index.next.method.stage1.output":"A bounded question","research-index.next.method.stage2.title":"Construct","research-index.next.method.stage2.short":"System","research-index.next.method.stage2.summary":"Build the smallest instrument that can expose the mechanism","research-index.next.method.stage2.input":"Question and constraints","research-index.next.method.stage2.output":"Inspectable apparatus","research-index.next.method.stage3.title":"Run","research-index.next.method.stage3.short":"Trial","research-index.next.method.stage3.summary":"Hold conditions still and record every consequential event","research-index.next.method.stage3.input":"Apparatus and protocol","research-index.next.method.stage3.output":"Observation record","research-index.next.method.stage4.title":"Challenge","research-index.next.method.stage4.short":"Test","research-index.next.method.stage4.summary":"Change seeds, cases, and assumptions to find where the result breaks","research-index.next.method.stage4.input":"Observation and alternatives","research-index.next.method.stage4.output":"Supported limits","research-index.next.method.stage5.title":"Transfer","research-index.next.method.stage5.short":"Handoff","research-index.next.method.stage5.summary":"Package only what survives review for a practical destination","research-index.next.method.stage5.input":"Result with limits","research-index.next.method.stage5.output":"Qualified handoff","research-index.next.shared.breadcrumb":"Research","research-index.shared.chapterSignals":"Chapter signals","research-index.glyph.shared.console":"Research evidence instrument","research-index.glyph.shared.live":"Method visible","research-index.glyph.shared.question":"Bounded question","research-index.glyph.shared.evidence":"Evidence relations","research-index.glyph.shared.sourcePrimary":"Direct record","research-index.glyph.shared.sourceContext":"Independent context","research-index.glyph.shared.sourceChallenge":"Contrary account","research-index.glyph.shared.supports":"Supports","research-index.glyph.shared.qualifies":"Qualifies","research-index.glyph.shared.challenges":"Challenges","research-index.glyph.shared.method":"Method gate","research-index.glyph.shared.result":"Bounded result","research-index.glyph.shared.receipt":"Question to result lineage","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.aria":"A question passes through supporting, contextual, and challenging evidence to produce an answer with reasons and visible limits","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.question":"Can I rely on this answer","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.questionMeta":"Need, context, and freshness are named first","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.method":"Compare and explain","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.methodMeta":"Keep the useful part and the open part apart","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.result":"An answer with reasons","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.resultRow1":"Supported part named","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.resultRow2":"Disagreement retained","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.resultRow3":"Change can be followed","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.receipt":"Reason within reach","research-index.glyph.mode.consumer.receiptMeta":"No mystery score","research-index.glyph.mode.business.aria":"A decision question passes through supporting, contextual, and challenging evidence to produce an approval with owners and review conditions","research-index.glyph.mode.business.question":"Should we approve this change","research-index.glyph.mode.business.questionMeta":"Risk, cost, and operational effect share one case","research-index.glyph.mode.business.method":"Test the decision case","research-index.glyph.mode.business.methodMeta":"Challenge assumptions while the choice can still move","research-index.glyph.mode.business.result":"A decision with conditions","research-index.glyph.mode.business.resultRow1":"Evidence attached","research-index.glyph.mode.business.resultRow2":"Owner and objection named","research-index.glyph.mode.business.resultRow3":"Review trigger recorded","research-index.glyph.mode.business.receipt":"Decision trail intact","research-index.glyph.mode.business.receiptMeta":"Ready to defend","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.aria":"A falsifiable question passes through identified evidence and a versioned method to produce a reproducible result with lineage and limitations","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.question":"Can another team replay this","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.questionMeta":"Acceptance and rejection conditions are declared","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.method":"Execute the pinned method","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.methodMeta":"Inputs, configuration, runtime, and evaluation stay identified","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.result":"A reproducible evidence packet","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.resultRow1":"Observation scoped","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.resultRow2":"Lineage queryable","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.resultRow3":"Revision replayable","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.receipt":"Method to output lineage","research-index.glyph.mode.technical.receiptMeta":"Ready to challenge","research-index.consumer.hero.eyebrow":"Dweve Research","research-index.consumer.hero.titleLead":"Know why an answer","research-index.consumer.hero.titleAccent":"deserves your trust","research-index.consumer.hero.lede":"A confident answer is easy to give. A useful answer shows why it deserves your trust. We compare the sources, point out what they do not settle, and update the answer when the facts move. You can use the conclusion without losing the route back to its reasons.","research-index.consumer.hero.primary":"Follow an answer to its sources","research-index.consumer.hero.secondary":"Read the research","research-index.consumer.close.eyebrow":"Keep following the evidence","research-index.consumer.close.title":"Ask for the reason behind the answer","research-index.consumer.close.body":"Read the research, inspect the sources, and challenge the conclusion. Confidence grows when the route to an answer stays open.","research-index.consumer.close.primary":"See research in Fabric","research-index.consumer.close.secondary":"Browse the papers","research-index.consumer.c1.eyebrow":"Chapter one, the question","research-index.consumer.c1.title":"Start with what you need to know","research-index.consumer.c1.accent":"before accepting the answer","research-index.consumer.c1.body":"The first job is not to sound certain. It is to understand what you need to decide, which part of the question matters now, and what could make today’s answer wrong tomorrow. That boundary keeps a simple explanation honest.","research-index.consumer.c1.tag1":"Clear question","research-index.consumer.c1.tag2":"Known limits","research-index.consumer.c1.tag3":"Useful answer","research-index.consumer.c1.footer":"A good question opens the trail. Next we decide what belongs on it","research-index.consumer.c1.sideEyebrow":"Before we answer","research-index.consumer.c1.sideTitle":"Three things to make visible","research-index.consumer.c1.sideFooter":"Confidence begins with an honest boundary","research-index.consumer.c1.sideRow1":"What is known","research-index.consumer.c1.sideValue1":"The part the available sources support","research-index.consumer.c1.sideRow2":"What is missing","research-index.consumer.c1.sideValue2":"The gap that still needs an answer","research-index.consumer.c1.sideRow3":"What could change","research-index.consumer.c1.sideValue3":"The event that would reopen the question","research-index.consumer.c1.artifactTitle":"The question desk","research-index.consumer.c1.artifactStatus":"Ready to inspect","research-index.consumer.c1.artifactMeta":"Question to answer","research-index.consumer.c1.artifactFootLeft":"Start with the need, not the confident sentence","research-index.consumer.c1.artifactFootRight":"Question first","research-index.consumer.c1.questionLabel":"The everyday need","research-index.consumer.c1.question":"Can I rely on this answer?","research-index.consumer.c1.questionNote":"The right answer depends on what is known, what is disputed, and how current the sources are.","research-index.consumer.c1.check1":"Find what is known","research-index.consumer.c1.check1Detail":"Locate the sources that speak directly to the question","research-index.consumer.c1.check2":"Keep differences visible","research-index.consumer.c1.check2Detail":"Do not smooth away a source that changes the conclusion","research-index.consumer.c1.check3":"Mark what may change","research-index.consumer.c1.check3Detail":"Name the date, event, or missing fact that could reopen the answer","research-index.consumer.c1.answerLabel":"A bounded answer","research-index.consumer.c1.answerTitle":"Useful without pretending certainty","research-index.consumer.c1.answerBody":"Say what the evidence supports, where it stops, and what to check next.","research-index.consumer.c1.answerKnown":"Supported part named","research-index.consumer.c1.answerOpen":"Open question retained","research-index.consumer.c2.eyebrow":"Chapter two, the evidence","research-index.consumer.c2.title":"See why each source matters","research-index.consumer.c2.accent":"and where it stops","research-index.consumer.c2.body":"A source can help without settling the whole question. We separate the record closest to the event from background context and from evidence that points another way. The result explains which part is supported and which part is still open.","research-index.consumer.c2.tag1":"Direct support","research-index.consumer.c2.tag2":"Visible disagreement","research-index.consumer.c2.tag3":"Plain limits","research-index.consumer.c2.footer":"Evidence can support an answer today. Next we show what happens tomorrow","research-index.consumer.c2.sideEyebrow":"Reading confidence","research-index.consumer.c2.sideTitle":"A sentence, not a mystery score","research-index.consumer.c2.sideFooter":"The explanation matters more than a decorative number","research-index.consumer.c2.legend1":"Well supported","research-index.consumer.c2.legend1Value":"Several relevant sources point the same way","research-index.consumer.c2.legend2":"Supported with limits","research-index.consumer.c2.legend2Value":"Useful evidence exists, but a condition remains","research-index.consumer.c2.legend3":"Still open","research-index.consumer.c2.legend3Value":"The available material does not settle the question","research-index.consumer.c2.artifactTitle":"The evidence window","research-index.consumer.c2.artifactStatus":"Sources visible","research-index.consumer.c2.artifactMeta":"Tap any source","research-index.consumer.c2.artifactFootLeft":"Every source keeps its own role","research-index.consumer.c2.artifactFootRight":"No disagreement hidden","research-index.consumer.c2.sourceTabs":"Evidence sources","research-index.consumer.c2.source1":"Direct record","research-index.consumer.c2.source1Type":"Closest to the event","research-index.consumer.c2.source1Relation":"Supports","research-index.consumer.c2.source1Detail":"This source answers the central part of the question directly. It carries the most weight, while still being read alongside the others.","research-index.consumer.c2.source2":"Independent context","research-index.consumer.c2.source2Type":"Explains the surrounding conditions","research-index.consumer.c2.source2Relation":"Qualifies","research-index.consumer.c2.source2Detail":"This source does not overturn the answer. It shows the condition under which the answer is useful and where it should not be stretched.","research-index.consumer.c2.source3":"Contrary account","research-index.consumer.c2.source3Type":"Challenges the easy conclusion","research-index.consumer.c2.source3Relation":"Disagrees","research-index.consumer.c2.source3Detail":"This source points another way. Keeping it visible prevents a neat summary from becoming a false certainty.","research-index.consumer.c2.inspectorEyebrow":"Why this source matters","research-index.consumer.c2.boundedLabel":"What we can say","research-index.consumer.c2.boundedTitle":"The answer follows the evidence","research-index.consumer.c2.boundedBody":"The supported part is stated clearly. The unresolved condition stays attached instead of disappearing.","research-index.consumer.c2.certaintyLabel":"Two supported parts and one open part","research-index.consumer.c2.boundedLimit":"Open condition: new or stronger evidence may change the answer","research-index.consumer.c3.eyebrow":"Chapter three, change","research-index.consumer.c3.title":"When the facts change","research-index.consumer.c3.accent":"the answer should too","research-index.consumer.c3.body":"Sources are corrected. Circumstances move. Better evidence arrives. A trustworthy answer should not quietly keep yesterday’s certainty. The earlier answer stays understandable, the correction is recorded, and the current answer explains what changed.","research-index.consumer.c3.tag1":"Change noticed","research-index.consumer.c3.tag2":"Earlier answer kept","research-index.consumer.c3.tag3":"Current answer clear","research-index.consumer.c3.footer":"A fresh answer is only useful when it reaches the moment you need it","research-index.consumer.c3.sideEyebrow":"Change notice","research-index.consumer.c3.sideTitle":"One event, a visible update","research-index.consumer.c3.sideFooter":"No silent overwrite and no unexplained disappearance","research-index.consumer.c3.noticeEarlier":"Earlier answer","research-index.consumer.c3.noticeCorrection":"Correction arrives","research-index.consumer.c3.noticeNow":"Current answer","research-index.consumer.c3.artifactTitle":"The answer history","research-index.consumer.c3.artifactStatus":"Current","research-index.consumer.c3.artifactMeta":"Earlier state retained","research-index.consumer.c3.artifactFootLeft":"The correction stays connected to both versions","research-index.consumer.c3.artifactFootRight":"History remains readable","research-index.consumer.c3.pastLabel":"Earlier","research-index.consumer.c3.pastTitle":"The first answer","research-index.consumer.c3.pastBody":"Reasonable from the sources available at that time.","research-index.consumer.c3.pastState":"Superseded","research-index.consumer.c3.eventLabel":"Change event","research-index.consumer.c3.eventTitle":"A source publishes a correction","research-index.consumer.c3.eventBody":"The affected part is reviewed instead of silently replaced.","research-index.consumer.c3.currentLabel":"Now","research-index.consumer.c3.currentTitle":"The revised answer","research-index.consumer.c3.currentBody":"The supported conclusion changes and the reason travels with it.","research-index.consumer.c3.currentState":"Current","research-index.consumer.c3.receiptTitle":"What changed","research-index.consumer.c3.receiptRow1":"Trigger","research-index.consumer.c3.receiptValue1":"Source correction","research-index.consumer.c3.receiptRow2":"Affected","research-index.consumer.c3.receiptValue2":"One part of the answer","research-index.consumer.c3.receiptRow3":"Action","research-index.consumer.c3.receiptValue3":"Review and revise","research-index.consumer.c4.eyebrow":"Chapter four, daily use","research-index.consumer.c4.title":"Research becomes useful","research-index.consumer.c4.accent":"when the answer helps","research-index.consumer.c4.body":"You should not need to read a methods paper before asking a normal question. The work shows up as a source you can open, a clear admission when the evidence is thin, and a visible update when the situation changes.","research-index.consumer.c4.tag1":"Open the source","research-index.consumer.c4.tag2":"See the limit","research-index.consumer.c4.tag3":"Follow the change","research-index.consumer.c4.footer":"The research stays in the background. Its reasons stay within reach","research-index.consumer.c4.sideEyebrow":"What reaches you","research-index.consumer.c4.sideTitle":"Small signs of careful work","research-index.consumer.c4.sideFooter":"Useful answers remain inspectable","research-index.consumer.c4.sideRow1":"A source you can open","research-index.consumer.c4.sideValue1":"The answer points back to what shaped it","research-index.consumer.c4.sideRow2":"A limit you can understand","research-index.consumer.c4.sideValue2":"Uncertainty is explained in ordinary language","research-index.consumer.c4.sideRow3":"A change you can follow","research-index.consumer.c4.sideValue3":"The current answer shows why it moved","research-index.consumer.c4.artifactTitle":"The everyday route","research-index.consumer.c4.artifactStatus":"Useful","research-index.consumer.c4.artifactMeta":"From need to confidence","research-index.consumer.c4.artifactFootLeft":"Research is quiet until you need the receipt","research-index.consumer.c4.artifactFootRight":"Confidence within reach","research-index.consumer.c4.originLabel":"Your starting point","research-index.consumer.c4.originTitle":"A question that matters now","research-index.consumer.c4.originBody":"You need enough confidence to act, not a performance of certainty.","research-index.consumer.c4.moment1":"Find the source","research-index.consumer.c4.moment1Body":"Open the material that supports the important part.","research-index.consumer.c4.moment1Outcome":"Reason visible","research-index.consumer.c4.moment2":"See the boundary","research-index.consumer.c4.moment2Body":"Know which part is settled and which part remains open.","research-index.consumer.c4.moment2Outcome":"Limit visible","research-index.consumer.c4.moment3":"Follow the update","research-index.consumer.c4.moment3Body":"Understand why a later answer differs from the earlier one.","research-index.consumer.c4.moment3Outcome":"Change visible","research-index.consumer.c4.outcomeLabel":"What you gain","research-index.consumer.c4.outcomeTitle":"Confidence you can inspect","research-index.consumer.c4.outcomeBody":"Enough clarity to use the answer and enough evidence to question it.","research-index.business.hero.eyebrow":"Dweve Research, evidence for decisions","research-index.business.hero.titleLead":"Turn an open question into","research-index.business.hero.titleAccent":"a decision with conditions","research-index.business.hero.lede":"Decision confidence comes from knowing what supports the choice, which objection still matters, who owns the consequence, and what should trigger review. We build that case while the decision can still move, then keep the evidence attached after approval.","research-index.business.hero.primary":"Inspect the decision case","research-index.business.hero.secondary":"Read the research","research-index.business.close.eyebrow":"Bring a live decision","research-index.business.close.title":"Put the evidence beside the choice","research-index.business.close.body":"Start with one decision where risk, cost, and operational impact are hard to separate. We can help make the question, evidence, assumptions, and change triggers explicit.","research-index.business.close.primary":"Talk to the team","research-index.business.close.secondary":"Read the papers","research-index.business.c1.eyebrow":"Chapter one, exposure","research-index.business.c1.title":"An approval without reasons","research-index.business.c1.accent":"creates tomorrow’s rework","research-index.business.c1.body":"The cost of a weak decision case often appears after approval. Teams rebuild the evidence, remember assumptions differently, and discover dependencies only when the operation changes. That recovery work is part of the original exposure, even when it is absent from the business case.","research-index.business.c1.tag1":"Decision risk","research-index.business.c1.tag2":"Cost of rework","research-index.business.c1.tag3":"Operational impact","research-index.business.c1.footer":"If the trail is part of the decision, the evidence has to enter before approval","research-index.business.c1.sideEyebrow":"Decision exposure","research-index.business.c1.sideTitle":"Three costs moving together","research-index.business.c1.sideFooter":"A missing reason is an operational liability","research-index.business.c1.sideRow1":"Risk","research-index.business.c1.sideValue1":"A weak assumption can travel into the control","research-index.business.c1.sideRow2":"Cost","research-index.business.c1.sideValue2":"Evidence is rebuilt when the decision is challenged","research-index.business.c1.sideRow3":"Operations","research-index.business.c1.sideValue3":"Teams cannot see what a change affects","research-index.business.c1.artifactTitle":"The exposure board","research-index.business.c1.artifactStatus":"Unresolved","research-index.business.c1.artifactMeta":"Illustrative decision","research-index.business.c1.artifactFootLeft":"The approval is visible. The reasoning is not","research-index.business.c1.artifactFootRight":"Exposure accumulates","research-index.business.c1.promptLabel":"Decision waiting","research-index.business.c1.promptTitle":"Proceed with the proposed operating change","research-index.business.c1.promptState":"Evidence trail incomplete","research-index.business.c1.lane1":"Decision risk","research-index.business.c1.lane1Body":"The strongest assumption has not been tested against a contrary source.","research-index.business.c1.lane1Signal":"Challenge may arrive after approval","research-index.business.c1.lane2":"Rework cost","research-index.business.c1.lane2Body":"The team can repeat the analysis but cannot reuse the reasoning behind it.","research-index.business.c1.lane2Signal":"Review starts from scattered files","research-index.business.c1.lane3":"Operational impact","research-index.business.c1.lane3Body":"The affected process is named, but its dependencies are not attached.","research-index.business.c1.lane3Signal":"Change travels further than expected","research-index.business.c1.missingLabel":"Missing asset","research-index.business.c1.missingTitle":"The decision trail","research-index.business.c1.missingBody":"Sources, assumptions, objections, owners, and change triggers are not held together.","research-index.business.c2.eyebrow":"Chapter two, evidence gate","research-index.business.c2.title":"Put the evidence gate","research-index.business.c2.accent":"before the approval","research-index.business.c2.body":"Every material claim should reach a visible gate before the choice hardens. The gate tests direct support, a serious contrary view, and the assumptions the operation must keep true. A hold is useful when it names exactly what must be resolved.","research-index.business.c2.tag1":"Support","research-index.business.c2.tag2":"Challenge","research-index.business.c2.tag3":"Assumptions","research-index.business.c2.footer":"A gate can hold a weak claim. It must also preserve disagreement that matters","research-index.business.c2.sideEyebrow":"Approval rule","research-index.business.c2.sideTitle":"What the gate asks","research-index.business.c2.sideFooter":"Held is a useful state when the reason is visible","research-index.business.c2.rule1":"Support","research-index.business.c2.rule1Value":"Does relevant evidence support the material claim?","research-index.business.c2.rule2":"Challenge","research-index.business.c2.rule2Value":"Has a serious contrary view been considered?","research-index.business.c2.rule3":"Assumption","research-index.business.c2.rule3Value":"Can the decision owner name what must remain true?","research-index.business.c2.ruleState":"One open assumption keeps the decision in review","research-index.business.c2.artifactTitle":"The evidence gate","research-index.business.c2.artifactStatus":"Review active","research-index.business.c2.artifactMeta":"Select a packet","research-index.business.c2.artifactFootLeft":"Evidence is checked while the choice can still move","research-index.business.c2.artifactFootRight":"Weak claims stop here","research-index.business.c2.packetTabs":"Evidence packets","research-index.business.c2.packet1":"Direct support","research-index.business.c2.packet1Detail":"Relevant source attached","research-index.business.c2.packet1Verdict":"Pass","research-index.business.c2.packet2":"Contrary view","research-index.business.c2.packet2Detail":"Material objection retained","research-index.business.c2.packet2Verdict":"Pass","research-index.business.c2.packet3":"Operating assumption","research-index.business.c2.packet3Detail":"Trigger not yet named","research-index.business.c2.packet3Verdict":"Hold","research-index.business.c2.gateLabel":"Current gate result","research-index.business.c2.gatePass":"The selected packet meets the review rule","research-index.business.c2.gateHold":"The selected packet needs a named condition","research-index.business.c2.laneLabel":"Decision state","research-index.business.c2.lanePass":"May continue to approval","research-index.business.c2.lanePassBody":"The reason for passing remains attached to the record.","research-index.business.c2.laneHold":"Remains in review","research-index.business.c2.laneHoldBody":"The process stops cleanly and says what evidence or condition is missing.","research-index.business.c3.eyebrow":"Chapter three, disagreement","research-index.business.c3.title":"Disagreement is a risk signal","research-index.business.c3.accent":"not noise","research-index.business.c3.body":"Several sources can repeat the same origin. A newer source can narrow an older conclusion. A serious objection can matter even when it is outnumbered. Research keeps those relationships visible so the decision owner can see where confidence depends on a fragile consensus.","research-index.business.c3.tag1":"Source independence","research-index.business.c3.tag2":"Current context","research-index.business.c3.tag3":"Material conflict","research-index.business.c3.footer":"Once disagreement is explicit, the decision can carry a defensible reason","research-index.business.c3.sideEyebrow":"Conflict register","research-index.business.c3.sideTitle":"What deserves attention","research-index.business.c3.sideFooter":"Consensus without ancestry can be false comfort","research-index.business.c3.sideRow1":"Independent support","research-index.business.c3.sideValue1":"Separate origins point in the same direction","research-index.business.c3.sideRow2":"Qualified support","research-index.business.c3.sideValue2":"A condition narrows where the claim applies","research-index.business.c3.sideRow3":"Material dispute","research-index.business.c3.sideValue3":"One objection could change the decision","research-index.business.c3.artifactTitle":"The disagreement map","research-index.business.c3.artifactStatus":"Conflict retained","research-index.business.c3.artifactMeta":"Evidence relationships","research-index.business.c3.artifactFootLeft":"Agreement is counted by origin, not by repetition","research-index.business.c3.artifactFootRight":"Conflict remains queryable","research-index.business.c3.claimLabel":"Decision claim","research-index.business.c3.claimTitle":"The proposed change is ready","research-index.business.c3.claimState":"Supported with one open condition","research-index.business.c3.supports":"Supports","research-index.business.c3.qualifies":"Qualifies","research-index.business.c3.disputes":"Disputes","research-index.business.c3.source1":"Primary record","research-index.business.c3.source1Note":"Direct origin with current scope","research-index.business.c3.source2":"Independent analysis","research-index.business.c3.source2Note":"Supports only under a stated condition","research-index.business.c3.source3":"Operational objection","research-index.business.c3.source3Note":"Raises a dependency the proposal omits","research-index.business.c3.source4":"Review note","research-index.business.c3.source4Note":"Confirms the evidence handling","research-index.business.c3.readoutTitle":"Material conflict","research-index.business.c3.readoutBody":"The operational objection is not averaged away. It becomes a condition on the decision.","research-index.business.c3.readoutState":"Owner response required","research-index.business.c4.eyebrow":"Chapter four, the record","research-index.business.c4.title":"One decision carries","research-index.business.c4.accent":"a visible chain of responsibility","research-index.business.c4.body":"Approval should leave more than a final slide. The record holds the decision, the evidence that shaped it, the unresolved limit, the accountable owner, the affected operations, and the event that should reopen the review.","research-index.business.c4.tag1":"Owner","research-index.business.c4.tag2":"Evidence","research-index.business.c4.tag3":"Change trigger","research-index.business.c4.footer":"A record is valuable when operations can use it after the meeting ends","research-index.business.c4.sideEyebrow":"Decision packet","research-index.business.c4.sideTitle":"What travels with approval","research-index.business.c4.sideFooter":"Responsibility remains attached to the reason","research-index.business.c4.packet1":"Decision","research-index.business.c4.packet1Value":"The bounded choice","research-index.business.c4.packet2":"Owner","research-index.business.c4.packet2Value":"The person accountable for review","research-index.business.c4.packet3":"Dependencies","research-index.business.c4.packet3Value":"The operations affected by the choice","research-index.business.c4.packet4":"Reopen when","research-index.business.c4.packet4Value":"The named condition changes","research-index.business.c4.artifactTitle":"The decision record","research-index.business.c4.artifactStatus":"Approved with condition","research-index.business.c4.artifactMeta":"Example packet","research-index.business.c4.artifactFootLeft":"The choice and its conditions move together","research-index.business.c4.artifactFootRight":"Reviewable after handover","research-index.business.c4.recordId":"Record","research-index.business.c4.recordIdValue":"Decision record","research-index.business.c4.recordState":"State","research-index.business.c4.recordStateValue":"Approved with condition","research-index.business.c4.recordReview":"Next review","research-index.business.c4.recordReviewValue":"When the named trigger fires","research-index.business.c4.decisionLabel":"Bounded decision","research-index.business.c4.decisionTitle":"Proceed inside the tested operating scope","research-index.business.c4.decisionBody":"The approval applies only while the recorded assumption remains true.","research-index.business.c4.evidenceTitle":"Evidence considered","research-index.business.c4.evidence1":"Direct support attached","research-index.business.c4.evidence2":"Independent context retained","research-index.business.c4.evidence3":"One operational limit remains","research-index.business.c4.impactTitle":"Impact view","research-index.business.c4.impact1":"Risk owner receives the open condition","research-index.business.c4.impact2":"Cost model keeps the tested scope","research-index.business.c4.impact3":"Operations receives the change trigger","research-index.business.c4.changeTitle":"Reopen rule","research-index.business.c4.changeBody":"Revisit the decision when the operating dependency changes or stronger contrary evidence arrives.","research-index.business.c4.changeState":"Watch condition active","research-index.business.c5.eyebrow":"Chapter five, operation","research-index.business.c5.title":"Research earns its place","research-index.business.c5.accent":"when the decision improves","research-index.business.c5.body":"The goal is not a larger report. It is a tighter operating loop: frame the uncertainty, gather evidence, challenge the claim, make a bounded choice, observe what happened, and revise when reality disagrees.","research-index.business.c5.tag1":"Less reconstruction","research-index.business.c5.tag2":"Earlier challenge","research-index.business.c5.tag3":"Clear handover","research-index.business.c5.footer":"The result is not certainty. It is a decision that knows how to learn","research-index.business.c5.sideEyebrow":"Operational outcome","research-index.business.c5.sideTitle":"What the loop is designed to reduce","research-index.business.c5.sideFooter":"Better evidence should change the work","research-index.business.c5.sideRow1":"Reconstruction","research-index.business.c5.sideValue1":"The reason travels with the decision","research-index.business.c5.sideRow2":"Late surprises","research-index.business.c5.sideValue2":"Material objections arrive before approval","research-index.business.c5.sideRow3":"Handover gaps","research-index.business.c5.sideValue3":"Operations receives limits and triggers","research-index.business.c5.artifactTitle":"The operating research loop","research-index.business.c5.artifactStatus":"Learning","research-index.business.c5.artifactMeta":"Decision as a living process","research-index.business.c5.artifactFootLeft":"Observe the outcome and feed it back into the question","research-index.business.c5.artifactFootRight":"Decision can revise","research-index.business.c5.coreLabel":"The operating question","research-index.business.c5.coreTitle":"What should we do now","research-index.business.c5.coreBody":"The choice begins with a bounded need and an explicit risk.","research-index.business.c5.step1":"Frame","research-index.business.c5.step1Body":"Name the decision and its limits","research-index.business.c5.step2":"Gather","research-index.business.c5.step2Body":"Collect relevant support and context","research-index.business.c5.step3":"Challenge","research-index.business.c5.step3Body":"Keep material disagreement visible","research-index.business.c5.step4":"Decide","research-index.business.c5.step4Body":"Approve a bounded course of action","research-index.business.c5.step5":"Observe","research-index.business.c5.step5Body":"Compare the outcome with the expectation","research-index.business.c5.outcomeLabel":"Operational result","research-index.business.c5.outcomeTitle":"A decision that can learn","research-index.business.c5.outcomeBody":"When the evidence or operating context changes, the review has a clear place to restart.","research-index.technical.hero.eyebrow":"Dweve Research, reproducible methods","research-index.technical.hero.titleLead":"Build the result","research-index.technical.hero.titleAccent":"so another team can replay it","research-index.technical.hero.lede":"Reproducibility starts before execution. We model the question as a falsifiable contract, preserve provenance at collection, identify every transformation and runtime condition, and connect observations to downstream claims. A replay should either reproduce the path or expose the condition that moved.","research-index.technical.hero.primary":"Trace the reproducibility contract","research-index.technical.hero.secondary":"Read the papers","research-index.technical.close.eyebrow":"Inspect the work","research-index.technical.close.title":"Reproduce the path, then challenge the result","research-index.technical.close.body":"Open the available code, review the method, replay what can be replayed, and keep the limitations beside the claim.","research-index.technical.close.primary":"Open GitHub","research-index.technical.close.secondary":"Read papers","research-index.technical.c1.eyebrow":"Chapter one, contract","research-index.technical.c1.title":"Freeze the research contract","research-index.technical.c1.accent":"before execution","research-index.technical.c1.body":"Declare the unit of enquiry, expected observation, acceptance rule, and kill condition before a run can produce an answer. The contract prevents the hypothesis from moving after the result and gives a replay an explicit target.","research-index.technical.c1.tag1":"Question","research-index.technical.c1.tag2":"Expected observation","research-index.technical.c1.tag3":"Kill condition","research-index.technical.c1.footer":"A clear contract says what to observe. Provenance says where the observation came from","research-index.technical.c1.sideEyebrow":"Research contract","research-index.technical.c1.sideTitle":"Three fields that prevent drift","research-index.technical.c1.sideFooter":"The hypothesis does not get to move after the run","research-index.technical.c1.sideRow1":"Question","research-index.technical.c1.sideValue1":"Narrow enough to produce a decisive observation","research-index.technical.c1.sideRow2":"Expected evidence","research-index.technical.c1.sideValue2":"Declared before the result is known","research-index.technical.c1.sideRow3":"Kill condition","research-index.technical.c1.sideValue3":"The observation that rejects the hypothesis","research-index.technical.c1.artifactTitle":"The method workbench","research-index.technical.c1.artifactStatus":"Contract pinned","research-index.technical.c1.artifactMeta":"Illustrative protocol","research-index.technical.c1.artifactFootLeft":"Question, method, and rejection rule stay together","research-index.technical.c1.artifactFootRight":"No result without a contract","research-index.technical.c1.question":"Does the method preserve the declared behaviour under the test conditions?","research-index.technical.c1.questionCode":"Question","research-index.technical.c1.questionScope":"Scope: one method, one controlled comparison, one named boundary","research-index.technical.c1.hypothesisLabel":"Hypothesis","research-index.technical.c1.hypothesis":"The declared behaviour remains observable under the pinned conditions","research-index.technical.c1.observationLabel":"Expected observation","research-index.technical.c1.observation":"The comparison stays within the acceptance rule","research-index.technical.c1.killLabel":"Kill condition","research-index.technical.c1.kill":"A material deviation rejects the hypothesis","research-index.technical.c1.runLabel":"Protocol run","research-index.technical.c1.runState":"Ready","research-index.technical.c1.runInput":"Inputs","research-index.technical.c1.runInputValue":"Pinned source set","research-index.technical.c1.runMethod":"Method","research-index.technical.c1.runMethodValue":"Versioned procedure","research-index.technical.c1.runResult":"Verdict","research-index.technical.c1.runResultValue":"Not evaluated","research-index.technical.c1.runFooter":"The contract is recorded before execution","research-index.technical.c2.eyebrow":"Chapter two, provenance","research-index.technical.c2.title":"Capture provenance","research-index.technical.c2.accent":"before transformation","research-index.technical.c2.body":"A result inherits every source and transformation behind it. Source identity, collection context, procedure version, and downstream dependencies enter the graph at the moment they are known so lineage remains queryable in both directions.","research-index.technical.c2.tag1":"Source identity","research-index.technical.c2.tag2":"Transform history","research-index.technical.c2.tag3":"Dependencies","research-index.technical.c2.footer":"Lineage reconstructs the path. Reproducibility determines whether the path can be run again","research-index.technical.c2.sideEyebrow":"Lineage queries","research-index.technical.c2.sideTitle":"Questions the graph must answer","research-index.technical.c2.sideFooter":"Forward and backward paths are both operational","research-index.technical.c2.query1":"Which source and version produced this observation?","research-index.technical.c2.query2":"Which procedure changed the material?","research-index.technical.c2.query3":"Which conclusions and outputs depend on it?","research-index.technical.c2.artifactTitle":"The provenance graph","research-index.technical.c2.artifactStatus":"Lineage complete","research-index.technical.c2.artifactMeta":"Sources to outputs","research-index.technical.c2.artifactFootLeft":"Every edge names a transformation or dependency","research-index.technical.c2.artifactFootRight":"Origin remains queryable","research-index.technical.c2.source1":"Direct source","research-index.technical.c2.source1Meta":"Identity and collection context retained","research-index.technical.c2.source2":"Independent source","research-index.technical.c2.source2Meta":"Separate origin retained","research-index.technical.c2.source3":"Contrary source","research-index.technical.c2.source3Meta":"Disagreement preserved","research-index.technical.c2.transform1":"Normalise","research-index.technical.c2.transform1Meta":"Procedure and version recorded","research-index.technical.c2.transform2":"Compare","research-index.technical.c2.transform2Meta":"Acceptance rule attached","research-index.technical.c2.claimLabel":"Research claim","research-index.technical.c2.claimTitle":"Bounded observation","research-index.technical.c2.claimMeta":"Support, conflict, and scope remain attached","research-index.technical.c2.output1":"Paper figure","research-index.technical.c2.output1Meta":"Depends on the bounded observation","research-index.technical.c2.output2":"Product decision","research-index.technical.c2.output2Meta":"Depends on the same evidence chain","research-index.technical.c3.eyebrow":"Chapter three, reproducibility","research-index.technical.c3.title":"Reproducibility is","research-index.technical.c3.accent":"an architectural property","research-index.technical.c3.body":"A method cannot be replayed from prose alone. Inputs, configuration, software version, runtime conditions, and evaluation rules need stable identities. If a replay differs, the system should expose which condition moved rather than hiding the mismatch.","research-index.technical.c3.tag1":"Pinned inputs","research-index.technical.c3.tag2":"Versioned method","research-index.technical.c3.tag3":"Comparable output","research-index.technical.c3.footer":"A replay can confirm the path or expose drift. The next problem is what happens after revision","research-index.technical.c3.sideEyebrow":"Run invariants","research-index.technical.c3.sideTitle":"What a replay needs","research-index.technical.c3.sideFooter":"Same declaration, inspectable difference","research-index.technical.c3.sideRow1":"Inputs","research-index.technical.c3.sideValue1":"The exact source set and versions","research-index.technical.c3.sideRow2":"Configuration","research-index.technical.c3.sideValue2":"Parameters and evaluation rule","research-index.technical.c3.sideRow3":"Environment","research-index.technical.c3.sideValue3":"Software and relevant runtime conditions","research-index.technical.c3.artifactTitle":"The replay console","research-index.technical.c3.artifactStatus":"Inputs aligned","research-index.technical.c3.artifactChanged":"Configuration changed","research-index.technical.c3.artifactMeta":"Tap to introduce drift","research-index.technical.c3.artifactFootLeft":"The receipt explains whether conditions still match","research-index.technical.c3.artifactFootRight":"Runs are comparable","research-index.technical.c3.artifactFootChanged":"Difference explained","research-index.technical.c3.manifestTitle":"Run manifest","research-index.technical.c3.manifestState":"Pinned","research-index.technical.c3.manifestInput":"source set, version fixed","research-index.technical.c3.manifestInputLabel":"input","research-index.technical.c3.manifestMethod":"procedure, version fixed","research-index.technical.c3.manifestMethodLabel":"method","research-index.technical.c3.manifestConfig":"evaluation rule, version fixed","research-index.technical.c3.manifestConfigLabel":"config","research-index.technical.c3.manifestConfigChanged":"evaluation rule, revised","research-index.technical.c3.manifestRuntime":"runtime conditions recorded","research-index.technical.c3.manifestRuntimeLabel":"runtime","research-index.technical.c3.changeButton":"Introduce a configuration change","research-index.technical.c3.restoreButton":"Restore the pinned configuration","research-index.technical.c3.runAState":"Complete","research-index.technical.c3.runALabel":"Run A","research-index.technical.c3.runBState":"Complete","research-index.technical.c3.runBChanged":"Complete with drift","research-index.technical.c3.runBLabel":"Run B","research-index.technical.c3.outputLabel":"Observation","research-index.technical.c3.outputA":"Expected pattern observed","research-index.technical.c3.outputB":"Expected pattern observed","research-index.technical.c3.outputBChanged":"Different pattern observed","research-index.technical.c3.receiptA":"Receipt A, pinned conditions","research-index.technical.c3.receiptB":"Receipt B, pinned conditions","research-index.technical.c3.receiptBChanged":"Receipt B, configuration differs","research-index.technical.c3.compareSame":"Conditions align","research-index.technical.c3.compareChanged":"One condition moved","research-index.technical.c4.eyebrow":"Chapter four, revision","research-index.technical.c4.title":"Evidence lineage","research-index.technical.c4.accent":"survives revision","research-index.technical.c4.body":"A correction should not overwrite the past or leave downstream work stranded. A new source event identifies affected claims and outputs, reopens only the relevant review, and records the transition from earlier version to current version.","research-index.technical.c4.tag1":"Revision event","research-index.technical.c4.tag2":"Affected outputs","research-index.technical.c4.tag3":"Version history","research-index.technical.c4.footer":"A research architecture needs more than one method. It needs programmes with explicit boundaries","research-index.technical.c4.sideEyebrow":"Version states","research-index.technical.c4.sideTitle":"History without ambiguity","research-index.technical.c4.sideFooter":"Earlier versions remain interpretable","research-index.technical.c4.legend1":"Current accepted version","research-index.technical.c4.legend2":"Under review","research-index.technical.c4.legend3":"Historical version","research-index.technical.c4.artifactTitle":"The revision graph","research-index.technical.c4.artifactStatus":"Propagation complete","research-index.technical.c4.artifactMeta":"Event to dependencies","research-index.technical.c4.artifactFootLeft":"The correction travels through declared dependencies","research-index.technical.c4.artifactFootRight":"No silent overwrite","research-index.technical.c4.eventLabel":"Evidence event","research-index.technical.c4.eventTitle":"A source correction arrives","research-index.technical.c4.eventBody":"The affected observation reopens while unrelated work remains stable.","research-index.technical.c4.version1":"Earlier observation","research-index.technical.c4.version1Meta":"Retained as historical context","research-index.technical.c4.version2":"Review state","research-index.technical.c4.version2Meta":"Correction and dependencies inspected","research-index.technical.c4.version3":"Current observation","research-index.technical.c4.version3Meta":"Revised scope and reason recorded","research-index.technical.c4.fanLabel":"Affected dependents","research-index.technical.c4.dependency1":"Paper figure","research-index.technical.c4.dependency1State":"Regenerate from current observation","research-index.technical.c4.dependency2":"Decision note","research-index.technical.c4.dependency2State":"Owner receives the revision","research-index.technical.c4.dependency3":"Evaluation case","research-index.technical.c4.dependency3State":"Retest the affected condition","research-index.technical.c5.eyebrow":"Chapter five, programmes","research-index.technical.c5.title":"Three programmes","research-index.technical.c5.accent":"three different laboratories","research-index.technical.c5.body":"The research portfolio does not force every question through one method. Jacquard studies deterministic, typed worlds. Forge studies program synthesis with solver-backed checks. Mycelia studies artificial life and emergence in a deterministic simulation.","research-index.technical.c5.tag1":"World representation","research-index.technical.c5.tag2":"Program synthesis","research-index.technical.c5.tag3":"Artificial life","research-index.technical.c5.footer":"Different laboratories produce different artefacts. Every claim still needs a receipt","research-index.technical.c5.sideEyebrow":"Programme registry","research-index.technical.c5.sideTitle":"Access and research posture","research-index.technical.c5.sideFooter":"Access is stated without pretending every programme is open","research-index.technical.c5.jacquardAccess":"Research track","research-index.technical.c5.forgeAccess":"Commercial research, not yet open","research-index.technical.c5.myceliaAccess":"Research codebase","research-index.technical.c5.artifactTitle":"The programme bench","research-index.technical.c5.artifactStatus":"Three methods","research-index.technical.c5.artifactMeta":"Current research portfolio","research-index.technical.c5.artifactFootLeft":"Each programme keeps its own method and boundary","research-index.technical.c5.artifactFootRight":"One standard for evidence","research-index.technical.c5.openProgramme":"Open programme","research-index.technical.c5.jacquardSubtitle":"Deterministic world engine","research-index.technical.c5.jacquardBody":"A browser based world engine with typed interfaces, a fixed time step, seeded randomness, and mechanical replay from the seed and input log.","research-index.technical.c5.jacquardStage1":"Typed world","research-index.technical.c5.jacquardStage2":"Deterministic step","research-index.technical.c5.jacquardStage3":"Replay log","research-index.technical.c5.jacquardFoot":"Private source; request evaluation access through Dweve","research-index.technical.c5.forgeSubtitle":"Program synthesis for kernels","research-index.technical.c5.forgeBody":"Forge generates and tests candidate kernel implementations, lowers them through Cranelift, measures them, and checks bounded correctness obligations.","research-index.technical.c5.forgeStage1":"Specification","research-index.technical.c5.forgeStage2":"Candidate search","research-index.technical.c5.forgeStage3":"Solver check","research-index.technical.c5.forgeFoot":"Commercial research and not yet open","research-index.technical.c5.myceliaSubtitle":"Artificial life and emergence","research-index.technical.c5.myceliaBody":"A deterministic digital world with hard physics where behaviour survives only when it pays its own energy cost. The simulation can replay tick by tick.","research-index.technical.c5.myceliaStage1":"Local rules","research-index.technical.c5.myceliaStage2":"Energy pressure","research-index.technical.c5.myceliaStage3":"Tick replay","research-index.technical.c5.myceliaFoot":"Research codebase with deterministic replay","research-index.technical.c6.eyebrow":"Chapter six, evidence packet","research-index.technical.c6.title":"A claim leaves","research-index.technical.c6.accent":"with its receipt","research-index.technical.c6.body":"A conclusion should carry enough structure for another reader to inspect what was asked, which method ran, which inputs mattered, what was observed, where the limitations sit, and which lineage connects the parts. The packet is evidence of the process, not proof that the conclusion can never be wrong.","research-index.technical.c6.tag1":"Method","research-index.technical.c6.tag2":"Observation","research-index.technical.c6.tag3":"Limitations","research-index.technical.c6.footer":"The result remains open to reproduction, revision, and challenge","research-index.technical.c6.sideEyebrow":"Evidence standard","research-index.technical.c6.sideTitle":"Minimum useful handoff","research-index.technical.c6.sideFooter":"Evidence stays useful because its limits stay visible","research-index.technical.c6.sideRow1":"Method","research-index.technical.c6.sideValue1":"Versioned procedure and evaluation rule","research-index.technical.c6.sideRow2":"Observation","research-index.technical.c6.sideValue2":"Result with its tested scope","research-index.technical.c6.sideRow3":"Limitations","research-index.technical.c6.sideValue3":"Known boundary and unresolved conflict","research-index.technical.c6.artifactTitle":"The evidence packet","research-index.technical.c6.artifactStatus":"Ready for review","research-index.technical.c6.artifactMeta":"Method to handoff","research-index.technical.c6.artifactFootLeft":"The packet records what the work establishes","research-index.technical.c6.artifactFootRight":"Challenge remains possible","research-index.technical.c6.manifestTitle":"research.receipt","research-index.technical.c6.manifestState":"Complete","research-index.technical.c6.codeQuestion":"bounded and falsifiable","research-index.technical.c6.codeQuestionLabel":"question","research-index.technical.c6.codeMethod":"versioned and inspectable","research-index.technical.c6.codeMethodLabel":"method","research-index.technical.c6.codeInputs":"identified and pinned","research-index.technical.c6.codeInputsLabel":"inputs","research-index.technical.c6.codeObservation":"recorded with scope","research-index.technical.c6.codeObservationLabel":"observation","research-index.technical.c6.codeLimitations":"kept beside the claim","research-index.technical.c6.codeLimitationsLabel":"limitations","research-index.technical.c6.codeLineage":"sources through outputs","research-index.technical.c6.codeLineageLabel":"lineage","research-index.technical.c6.checkTitle":"Receipt checks","research-index.technical.c6.check1":"Question declared","research-index.technical.c6.check1Value":"The unit of enquiry and boundary are explicit","research-index.technical.c6.check2":"Method reproducible","research-index.technical.c6.check2Value":"Inputs, configuration, and procedure are identified","research-index.technical.c6.check3":"Lineage connected","research-index.technical.c6.check3Value":"Sources and dependent outputs remain queryable","research-index.technical.c6.check4":"Limit retained","research-index.technical.c6.check4Value":"The packet does not turn process evidence into eternal truth","research-index.technical.c6.handoffLabel":"Handoff","research-index.technical.c6.handoffTitle":"Ready to reproduce or challenge","research-index.technical.c6.handoffBody":"Another reader can follow the method, inspect the observation, and see what would reopen the conclusion.","research-index.technical.c6.handoffState":"Evidence, not infallibility","research-programme.breadcrumb":"Research","research-programme.technical.hero.eyebrow":"Dweve research programme","research-programme.technical.hero.lead":"Bind every claim.","research-programme.technical.hero.accent":"To the exact run.","research-programme.technical.hero.tail":"to the run that supports it","research-programme.technical.hero.body":"Dweve's research programme brings together three active research routes, six ABMN working papers, and two investigative reports. The papers are drafts; this page makes no claim that a journal or conference has peer-reviewed them, and every entry carries the status of the record it actually is.","research-programme.technical.hero.primary":"Inspect the programme","research-programme.technical.hero.secondary":"See the paper set","research-programme.business.hero.eyebrow":"Dweve research programme","research-programme.business.hero.lead":"Mark the boundary.","research-programme.business.hero.accent":"Protect the plan.","research-programme.business.hero.tail":"a delivery plan","research-programme.business.hero.body":"The Dweve research programme separates questions worth funding from capabilities ready to operate. It covers three active research lines, six ABMN working papers, two investigations, and the evidence gates a result must pass before it can be described as a product capability.","research-programme.business.hero.primary":"Map the portfolio","research-programme.business.hero.secondary":"Review the drafts","research-programme.consumer.hero.eyebrow":"Dweve research programme","research-programme.consumer.hero.lead":"Test the unknown.","research-programme.consumer.hero.accent":"Read the evidence.","research-programme.consumer.hero.tail":"to read today","research-programme.consumer.hero.body":"Research is not the same as a finished product. This Dweve research programme follows the questions under test, six draft technical papers, and two investigations. The labels show which kind of work you are reading.","research-programme.consumer.hero.primary":"Explore the research","research-programme.consumer.hero.secondary":"See the draft papers","research-programme.hero.ledger.label":"Programme register","research-programme.hero.ledger.pill":"Status attached","research-programme.hero.ledger.programmes":"Research routes","research-programme.hero.ledger.programmesValue":"3 active","research-programme.hero.ledger.papers":"ABMN family","research-programme.hero.ledger.papersValue":"6 working papers","research-programme.hero.ledger.reports":"Investigations","research-programme.hero.ledger.reportsValue":"2 readable reports","research-programme.hero.ledger.rule":"Boundary","research-programme.hero.ledger.ruleValue":"Draft is not published","research-programme.map.eyebrow":"The output map","research-programme.map.lead":"Access is not a promise","research-programme.map.accent":"so read the status beside it","research-programme.map.tag1":"Question before claim","research-programme.map.tag2":"Evidence before transfer","research-programme.map.tag3":"Release stated separately","research-programme.map.footer":"Every output says what it is and what it does not establish","research-programme.technical.map.body":"The programme publishes four different objects: active research routes, technical working papers, investigative reports, and software that has crossed into a released foundation. Their evidence may connect, but their status does not transfer from one object to another.","research-programme.business.map.body":"A research route can inform a decision without becoming a contracted capability. The map keeps experimental work, review drafts, complete investigations and supported releases in separate lanes, so planning starts from the correct evidence level.","research-programme.consumer.map.body":"Some pages describe questions still being tested. Others are papers you can review, reports you can read, or software already released. The labels below tell you which is which.","research-programme.technical.map.verdict":"The evidence may connect across families; the maturity label never transfers automatically","research-programme.business.map.verdict":"A useful result may support a decision without entering the delivery catalogue","research-programme.consumer.map.verdict":"Read the label before reading the claim","research-programme.map.side.kicker":"Output register","research-programme.map.side.title":"Four different status contracts","research-programme.map.side.foot":"Status belongs to the object, version and date","research-programme.map.side.programme":"Programme","research-programme.map.side.programmeState":"Question and apparatus","research-programme.map.side.paper":"Working paper","research-programme.map.side.paperState":"Draft for review","research-programme.map.side.report":"Investigation","research-programme.map.side.reportState":"Readable report","research-programme.map.side.release":"Release","research-programme.map.side.releaseState":"Delivered terms","research-programme.map.programme.kind":"Active research","research-programme.map.programme.title":"Programme routes","research-programme.map.programme.body":"Jacquard, Forge, and Mycelia each state a question, a proposed mechanism, the evidence they can produce, and the boundary around their current status.","research-programme.map.programme.state":"Research","research-programme.map.paper.kind":"Technical record","research-programme.map.paper.title":"ABMN working papers","research-programme.map.paper.body":"Six July 2026 working papers document one model-family contract, four task-specific memory organisations, and one generalisation test.","research-programme.map.paper.state":"Draft","research-programme.map.report.kind":"Investigative output","research-programme.map.report.title":"Evidence-led reports","research-programme.map.report.body":"Two readable investigations examine European digital dependence and Dutch road safety.","research-programme.map.report.state":"Readable","research-programme.map.release.kind":"Released work","research-programme.map.release.title":"Open foundations","research-programme.map.release.body":"HEDL now belongs in the open-source catalogue. Its old research URL redirects to that released foundation.","research-programme.map.release.state":"Released","research-programme.statusBanner.eyebrow":"Status vocabulary","research-programme.technical.statusBanner.title":"A benchmark snapshot does not compile into a release","research-programme.technical.statusBanner.body":"A question becomes a prototype, a run produces a snapshot, and a separate engineering and governance process may produce a release. Each transition requires new evidence.","research-programme.business.statusBanner.title":"Maturity changes only when its gate is passed","research-programme.business.statusBanner.body":"Technical completeness, a convincing result and commercial availability are different decisions. Budget and commitments should follow the named status, not the polish of the demonstration.","research-programme.consumer.statusBanner.title":"Finished-looking work can still be unfinished research","research-programme.consumer.statusBanner.body":"A detailed paper or working demonstration can be useful before it is final. The status label tells you whether you are reading a question, a test, a measured snapshot or released work.","research-programme.status.question":"Question","research-programme.status.questionBody":"The claim is framed so evidence can change it.","research-programme.status.prototype":"Prototype","research-programme.status.prototypeBody":"An apparatus exists, with a bounded purpose.","research-programme.status.snapshot":"Snapshot","research-programme.status.snapshotBody":"A result holds under recorded conditions.","research-programme.status.released":"Released","research-programme.status.releasedBody":"Terms, ownership and supported scope exist.","research-programme.lines.eyebrow":"Active research lines","research-programme.lines.lead":"State the question","research-programme.lines.accent":"before the benefit","research-programme.lines.tag1":"Jacquard","research-programme.lines.tag2":"Forge","research-programme.lines.tag3":"Mycelia","research-programme.lines.footer":"Open a programme route for its mechanism, evidence and limits","research-programme.technical.lines.body":"Jacquard studies replayable agent-built worlds, Forge studies program synthesis with verification, and Mycelia studies deterministic artificial life. The apparatus changes with the claim, state space, and failure model.","research-programme.business.lines.body":"The three lines examine control in agent-built environments, engineering leverage from verified synthesis, and adaptation without a central controller. A research result is not a supported product entitlement.","research-programme.consumer.lines.body":"Jacquard asks whether an agent-built world can be replayed. Forge searches for smaller or faster programs and checks the candidates. Mycelia studies how complex behaviour can emerge from local rules. All three remain research programmes.","research-programme.technical.lines.verdict":"Three apparatuses, three failure models, one rule: preserve the boundary with the claim","research-programme.business.lines.verdict":"Research access and supported product availability remain separate decisions","research-programme.consumer.lines.verdict":"Each page tells you the question, what exists now and what is still unknown","research-programme.lines.side.kicker":"Portfolio signal","research-programme.lines.side.title":"Different mechanisms, explicit status","research-programme.lines.side.foot":"Hypothesis in; reviewable evidence out","research-programme.lines.side.hypothesis":"Hypothesis in","research-programme.lines.side.evidence":"Evidence out","research-programme.programme.question":"Question","research-programme.programme.boundary":"Boundary","research-programme.programme.open":"Open programme","research-programme.programme.jacquard.name":"Jacquard","research-programme.programme.jacquard.field":"Agent-built worlds","research-programme.programme.jacquard.status":"Active internal R&D","research-programme.programme.jacquard.node1":"Editor","research-programme.programme.jacquard.node2":"Agent","research-programme.programme.jacquard.node3":"Test","research-programme.programme.jacquard.body":"An internal, browser-native 3D research engine whose editor, agents, and tests share one typed operation surface, with fixed-timestep execution, seeded randomness, and replayable input logs.","research-programme.programme.jacquard.question":"Can an agent build and change a complete interactive world through replayable typed operations?","research-programme.programme.jacquard.boundary":"Not a product, service, package, or public open-source release.","research-programme.programme.forge.name":"Forge","research-programme.programme.forge.field":"Program synthesis","research-programme.programme.forge.status":"Active internal R&D","research-programme.programme.forge.node1":"Specification","research-programme.programme.forge.node2":"Candidate","research-programme.programme.forge.node3":"Evidence","research-programme.programme.forge.body":"An internal synthesis research engine that searches typed expressions, measures candidates, and checks bounded correctness obligations with formal solvers.","research-programme.programme.forge.question":"Can synthesis find a faster or smaller kernel and establish equivalence strongly enough for review?","research-programme.programme.forge.boundary":"Not a product, service, open-source framework, or general synthesis platform.","research-programme.programme.mycelia.name":"Mycelia","research-programme.programme.mycelia.field":"Artificial life","research-programme.programme.mycelia.status":"Active internal R&D","research-programme.programme.mycelia.node1":"World","research-programme.programme.mycelia.node2":"Organism","research-programme.programme.mycelia.node3":"History","research-programme.programme.mycelia.body":"An internal, deterministic artificial-life research substrate for local physics, chemistry, biology, ecology, and information constraints, with conservation and cross-target checks.","research-programme.programme.mycelia.question":"Can adaptive behaviour emerge from explicit local constraints without a human-defined reward function?","research-programme.programme.mycelia.boundary":"Not a product, service, open-source package, or scientific conclusion.","research-programme.programme.hedl":"The HEDL line has crossed into released open work and is no longer presented here as an active research programme.","research-programme.programme.hedlAction":"Open HEDL","research-programme.abmn.eyebrow":"The working-paper family","research-programme.abmn.lead":"Read the family paper","research-programme.abmn.accent":"before the task drafts","research-programme.abmn.tag1":"July 2026 drafts","research-programme.abmn.tag2":"Draft on request","research-programme.abmn.tag3":"In English","research-programme.abmn.footer":"Every detail route carries the summary; the draft is released on request","research-programme.technical.abmn.body":"Adaptive Binary Memory Networks define a learn-strip-execute contract. Four drafts instantiate it as prototype memory for NER, association bitplanes for classification, bridge memory for reranking, and index memory for lexical retrieval. A sixth carries the same contract to a Tsetlin machine to see whether it survives a structurally different learner.","research-programme.business.abmn.body":"The family paper defines the shared deployment contract. Four companion drafts apply it to sequence labelling, classification, reranking, and retrieval, and one tests whether it generalises to a different kind of learner. They are review material, not evidence of publication or product availability.","research-programme.consumer.abmn.body":"The first draft explains the common idea. Four companion drafts apply it to finding names, classifying text, reranking search results, and retrieving documents, and the last one checks whether the idea holds up on a different kind of learner. Ask us for any of them; they are still drafts.","research-programme.technical.abmn.verdict":"Six July 2026 drafts, each with its source directory; no publication venue or acceptance claim is asserted","research-programme.business.abmn.verdict":"Use the drafts for technical review, not as evidence of peer-reviewed publication","research-programme.consumer.abmn.verdict":"Readable working drafts, not published results","research-programme.abmn.side.title":"Four task-owned memories","research-programme.abmn.familyCode":"FAMILY","research-programme.abmn.side.foot":"The family contract stays shared; memory and decoder belong to the task","research-programme.abmn.memory.prototype":"Prototype memory","research-programme.abmn.memory.bitplane":"Association bitplanes","research-programme.abmn.memory.bridge":"Bridge memory","research-programme.abmn.memory.index":"Index memory","research-programme.lifecycle.eyebrow":"ABMN family contract","research-programme.lifecycle.lead":"A shared contract","research-programme.lifecycle.accent":"does not make tasks interchangeable","research-programme.lifecycle.tag1":"Build state is temporary","research-programme.lifecycle.tag2":"Serving state is explicit","research-programme.lifecycle.tag3":"Decoding stays task-owned","research-programme.lifecycle.footer":"One lifecycle does not mean one universal memory layout","research-programme.technical.lifecycle.body":"Training or corpus adaptation may use richer integer and fixed-point state. Stripping removes build-only state and emits the representation consumed by the deployed decoder. The paper family tests this contract across four output structures, and a sixth paper asks whether it holds for a structurally different learner.","research-programme.business.lifecycle.body":"The shared lifecycle makes a model build identifiable and gives deployment a defined handoff. What gets handed over still differs by task, so operational review must follow the actual paper and artifact rather than the family name alone.","research-programme.consumer.lifecycle.body":"The model is built with temporary working state, packed into the form it needs to run, then read by a task-specific decoder. That separation is the common idea behind all six drafts.","research-programme.technical.lifecycle.verdict":"The strip boundary is a systems contract, not a compression afterthought","research-programme.business.lifecycle.verdict":"A shared lifecycle supports review, but each task keeps its own operating obligations","research-programme.consumer.lifecycle.verdict":"Build, pack, run: the workbench does not ship with the finished tool","research-programme.lifecycle.side.kicker":"Lifecycle instrument","research-programme.lifecycle.side.title":"Build state stops at the strip boundary","research-programme.lifecycle.side.foot":"The deployed artifact is the model","research-programme.lifecycle.learn":"Learn","research-programme.lifecycle.learnState":"Mutable","research-programme.lifecycle.learnBody":"Task evidence or corpus state shapes temporary adaptation memory under a fixed build contract.","research-programme.lifecycle.learnOut":"Output: finalised task memory","research-programme.lifecycle.strip":"Strip","research-programme.lifecycle.stripState":"Boundary","research-programme.lifecycle.stripBody":"Build-only counters and mutable writer state are removed; canonical deployed memory is emitted.","research-programme.lifecycle.stripOut":"Output: deployed artifact","research-programme.lifecycle.execute":"Execute","research-programme.lifecycle.executeState":"Read only","research-programme.lifecycle.executeBody":"A task-specific integer or fixed-point decoder consumes the deployed memory directly.","research-programme.lifecycle.executeOut":"Output: task result","research-programme.lifecycle.prototype":"NER prototypes plus BIO-constrained Viterbi decoding.","research-programme.lifecycle.bitplane":"Classifier sign and magnitude planes plus stable argmax.","research-programme.lifecycle.bridge":"Learned typed bridges plus deterministic candidate reranking.","research-programme.lifecycle.index":"Sealed postings and bounds plus fixed-point top-k retrieval.","research-programme.draftBanner.stamp":"Working paper","research-programme.draftBanner.eyebrow":"Publication boundary","research-programme.technical.draftBanner.title":"A complete paper can still be a draft","research-programme.technical.draftBanner.body":"The repository contains July 2026 sources for six papers. It does not contain a publication venue, acceptance record or peer-review status, so the library labels them as working papers and releases them on request.","research-programme.business.draftBanner.title":"Do not promote review material into proof of publication","research-programme.business.draftBanner.body":"The drafts carry real methods and measurements. They can support diligence, but they do not establish external review, acceptance or a generally available product.","research-programme.consumer.draftBanner.title":"You can read the papers before they are finished","research-programme.consumer.draftBanner.body":"Each one is a real draft from the ABMN paper family, and we send it when you ask. The page keeps that status visible so a readable document is not mistaken for a published result.","research-programme.draftBanner.action":"Review the six drafts","research-programme.evidence.eyebrow":"Evidence discipline","research-programme.evidence.lead":"Results travel","research-programme.evidence.accent":"with their conditions","research-programme.evidence.tag1":"Method kept","research-programme.evidence.tag2":"Failure visible","research-programme.evidence.tag3":"Limits shown","research-programme.evidence.footer":"A headline number is not a reproduction packet","research-programme.technical.evidence.body":"A technical claim needs the question, data or task, build and environment, method, baseline, metric, raw observation, failure record and limit at the same granularity. A different environment may answer a different question.","research-programme.business.evidence.body":"Evidence is useful when a decision owner can see what was measured, which assumptions carry the result, what failed and which new cost appears at transfer. Targets, estimates and measured outcomes stay separate.","research-programme.consumer.evidence.body":"A number only makes sense beside what was tested and where the test stops applying. The evidence bench keeps the route to the result visible without asking you to accept a screenshot on trust.","research-programme.technical.evidence.verdict":"Environment, comparison and limit remain part of the technical claim","research-programme.business.evidence.verdict":"Decision confidence comes from inspectable conditions, not a larger headline","research-programme.consumer.evidence.verdict":"The answer keeps the route that produced it","research-programme.evidence.side.kicker":"Claim check","research-programme.evidence.side.title":"Four fields every result keeps","research-programme.evidence.side.tag":"Required","research-programme.evidence.side.foot":"Remove one field and the claim changes","research-programme.evidence.question":"Question","research-programme.evidence.questionBody":"What could the run actually change?","research-programme.evidence.method":"Method","research-programme.evidence.methodBody":"Which path produced the observation?","research-programme.evidence.result":"Result","research-programme.evidence.resultBody":"What was observed, under which metric?","research-programme.evidence.limit":"Limit","research-programme.evidence.limitBody":"Where does the conclusion stop?","research-programme.evidence.bench.question":"Review question","research-programme.technical.evidence.benchQuestion":"Can another engineer reproduce or challenge this exact claim?","research-programme.technical.evidence.benchBody":"The packet must identify the implementation, input, environment, comparison and failure boundary closely enough to make disagreement useful.","research-programme.business.evidence.benchQuestion":"Can the evidence support this decision without hiding transfer cost?","research-programme.business.evidence.benchBody":"The record distinguishes measured value from expected value and names the dependencies that could reverse the case.","research-programme.consumer.evidence.benchQuestion":"Can I see what was tested and what the answer does not mean?","research-programme.consumer.evidence.benchBody":"The result is explained in ordinary language while its conditions and uncertainty remain attached.","research-programme.evidence.bench.scope":"Scope","research-programme.evidence.bench.scopeBody":"Question, task and acceptance rule","research-programme.evidence.bench.input":"Input","research-programme.evidence.bench.inputBody":"Dataset, corpus, rights and version","research-programme.evidence.bench.environment":"Environment","research-programme.evidence.bench.environmentBody":"Hardware, build, runtime and configuration","research-programme.evidence.bench.comparison":"Comparison","research-programme.evidence.bench.comparisonBody":"Baseline, metric and measurement scope","research-programme.evidence.bench.failure":"Failure","research-programme.evidence.bench.failureBody":"Counterexamples, divergence and incomplete runs","research-programme.evidence.bench.limit":"Limit","research-programme.evidence.bench.limitBody":"What the result cannot establish","research-programme.reports.eyebrow":"Investigative research outputs","research-programme.reports.lead":"Not every result","research-programme.reports.accent":"needs a benchmark","research-programme.reports.tag1":"Evidence-led","research-programme.reports.tag2":"Sources named","research-programme.reports.tag3":"Read in Books","research-programme.reports.footer":"The reports remain in Books and also appear here as research outputs","research-programme.technical.reports.body":"The investigative reports apply a research method to public-policy and infrastructure questions rather than to an ABMN mechanism. They retain their own source base, confidence limits and reader routes, and do not become technical papers by proximity.","research-programme.business.reports.body":"Two complete investigations turn broad public questions into evidence, mechanisms and decisions: actual control in European digital infrastructure, and the systems behind the Dutch road-safety trajectory.","research-programme.consumer.reports.body":"These reports begin with questions that affect public life. One follows who really controls Europe's digital stack. The other examines why Dutch road deaths moved in the wrong direction and which decisions could change that.","research-programme.technical.reports.verdict":"A distinct research-output family with its own method, subjects and reader contract","research-programme.business.reports.verdict":"Two complete investigations, each tied to a decision question rather than a product claim","research-programme.consumer.reports.verdict":"Both reports are complete reader editions and remain available in Books","research-programme.reports.side.kicker":"Report shelf","research-programme.reports.side.title":"Two complete investigations","research-programme.reports.side.foot":"Distinct subjects; shared evidence discipline","research-programme.report.subject":"Subject","research-programme.report.form":"Form","research-programme.report.open":"Read report","research-programme.report.sovereignty.short":"Digital control","research-programme.report.sovereignty.state":"Living report","research-programme.report.sovereignty.title":"The sovereignty illusion","research-programme.report.sovereignty.body":"A living investigation into the gap between European digital-sovereignty language and the ownership, infrastructure, vendors, contracts, capital, and law that determine actual control.","research-programme.report.sovereignty.subject":"European digital dependence","research-programme.report.sovereignty.form":"Living investigative report","research-programme.report.traffic.short":"Road safety","research-programme.report.traffic.state":"2026 report","research-programme.report.traffic.title":"Traffic safety in the Netherlands","research-programme.report.traffic.body":"An evidence-led systems investigation of the 2025 road-safety baseline, accident mechanisms, licensing, enforcement, training, and decisions that could alter the 2030 trajectory.","research-programme.report.traffic.subject":"Dutch road safety","research-programme.report.traffic.form":"Investigative report","research-programme.transfer.eyebrow":"Promotion into product","research-programme.transfer.lead":"Nothing becomes a product","research-programme.transfer.accent":"by sitting next to one","research-programme.transfer.tag1":"Contract","research-programme.transfer.tag2":"Operation","research-programme.transfer.tag3":"Named owner","research-programme.transfer.footer":"A promising result does not inherit support, security or maintenance","research-programme.technical.transfer.body":"Promotion requires a stable interface, tests against the claim and failure model, security review, documentation, supported performance evidence, deployment and recovery behaviour, compatibility rules and a maintainer who owns the release.","research-programme.business.transfer.body":"A result becomes operational only when the destination accepts its cost, dependencies, failure path, support model and accountability. Until then it remains research, however useful the mechanism may be.","research-programme.consumer.transfer.body":"A tested idea still needs engineering, safety checks, documentation and someone responsible for keeping it working. Dweve only calls it a product capability after those duties have an owner.","research-programme.technical.transfer.verdict":"Research evidence enters the gate; a supported contract leaves it","research-programme.business.transfer.verdict":"Value transfers only with cost, risk, ownership and exit made visible","research-programme.consumer.transfer.verdict":"A useful experiment is not yet something people should depend on","research-programme.transfer.side.kicker":"Gate monitor","research-programme.transfer.side.title":"Evidence is necessary, not sufficient","research-programme.transfer.side.foot":"Seven obligations stand between a result and a release","research-programme.transfer.source":"Research input","research-programme.transfer.sourceTitle":"Qualified mechanism","research-programme.transfer.sourceBody":"A bounded result with its interface, reproduction packet, benchmark context, failures and limits.","research-programme.transfer.destination":"Release output","research-programme.transfer.destinationTitle":"Supported capability","research-programme.transfer.destinationBody":"A versioned contract with deployment scope, documentation, maintenance, support and accountable ownership.","research-programme.transfer.gate.contract":"Contract","research-programme.transfer.gate.contractState":"Stable","research-programme.transfer.gate.contractBody":"Interface, state and compatibility are explicit.","research-programme.transfer.gate.test":"Tests","research-programme.transfer.gate.testState":"Repeatable","research-programme.transfer.gate.testBody":"Claims, edge cases and recovery have executable checks.","research-programme.transfer.gate.security":"Security","research-programme.transfer.gate.securityState":"Reviewed","research-programme.transfer.gate.securityBody":"Trust boundaries and abuse paths have owners.","research-programme.transfer.gate.documentation":"Documentation","research-programme.transfer.gate.documentationBody":"Scope, prerequisites, failures and operation are usable.","research-programme.transfer.gate.performance":"Performance","research-programme.transfer.gate.performanceBody":"Supported conditions and capacity limits are measured.","research-programme.transfer.gate.operation":"Operation","research-programme.transfer.gate.operationState":"Owned","research-programme.transfer.gate.operationBody":"Deploy, observe, recover, update and exit are defined.","research-programme.transfer.gate.owner":"Owner","research-programme.transfer.gate.ownerBody":"A maintainer accepts release and support responsibility.","research-programme.partners.eyebrow":"Research partnerships","research-programme.partners.lead":"Agree the question","research-programme.partners.accent":"before the access","research-programme.partners.tag1":"Rights agreed","research-programme.partners.tag2":"Evidence shared","research-programme.partners.tag3":"Exit designed","research-programme.partners.footer":"Access follows the research contract, not the other way round","research-programme.technical.partners.body":"A useful partner brings a falsifiable question, valid inputs or hardware, a comparison, an acceptance rule and an engineer or researcher who can review failures. Code, data, publication and IP boundaries are settled before access.","research-programme.business.partners.body":"The partnership packet names the decision, contribution, infrastructure and data boundary, evidence ownership, publication rights, cost, support and exit. That keeps exploratory access from becoming an implied delivery promise.","research-programme.consumer.partners.body":"Research partners do more than ask for a demonstration. They help define the question, supply permitted material, inspect the evidence and agree what may be shared when the work ends.","research-programme.technical.partners.verdict":"The smallest credible partnership is one bounded question with a reviewable packet","research-programme.business.partners.verdict":"Contribution, rights, evidence and exit are agreed before work starts","research-programme.consumer.partners.verdict":"A clear question makes an honest answer possible","research-programme.partners.side.kicker":"Partner intake","research-programme.partners.side.title":"Four boundaries before access","research-programme.partners.side.foot":"The packet stays understandable after the project ends","research-programme.partners.question":"Question","research-programme.partners.questionState":"Falsifiable","research-programme.partners.rights":"Rights","research-programme.partners.rightsState":"Permitted inputs","research-programme.partners.review":"Review","research-programme.partners.reviewState":"Named readers","research-programme.partners.exit":"Exit","research-programme.partners.exitState":"Return and retention","research-programme.partners.packet.label":"Minimum research packet","research-programme.technical.partners.packetTitle":"Enough context to reproduce disagreement","research-programme.technical.partners.packetBody":"The packet lets another technical reader distinguish a mechanism failure, an input change, an environment change and an interpretation dispute.","research-programme.business.partners.packetTitle":"One record for the scientific and commercial boundary","research-programme.business.partners.packetBody":"The same packet tells each owner what was contributed, what was observed, what may be used and what ends with the engagement.","research-programme.consumer.partners.packetTitle":"A question, a fair test and a clear ending","research-programme.consumer.partners.packetBody":"The record shows what everyone agreed to test and what happens to the material and results afterwards.","research-programme.partners.packet.question":"Question","research-programme.partners.packet.questionBody":"Hypothesis, baseline and stop rule","research-programme.partners.packet.contribution":"Contribution","research-programme.partners.packet.contributionBody":"People, data, code, hardware or domain review","research-programme.partners.packet.boundary":"Boundary","research-programme.partners.packet.boundaryBody":"Access, security, jurisdiction and retention","research-programme.partners.packet.evidence":"Evidence","research-programme.partners.packet.evidenceBody":"Raw record, method, failures and interpretation","research-programme.partners.packet.publication":"Publication","research-programme.partners.packet.publicationBody":"Review, attribution, IP and open-source intentions","research-programme.partners.packet.exit":"Exit","research-programme.partners.packet.exitBody":"Return, deletion, support and follow-on decision","research-programme.frame.bounded":"Bounded","research-programme.frame.active":"Active research","research-programme.frame.draft":"Draft family","research-programme.frame.familyContract":"Family contract","research-programme.frame.reviewable":"Reviewable","research-programme.frame.readable":"Readable now","research-programme.frame.notAutomatic":"Not automatic","research-programme.frame.scoped":"Scoped","research-programme.technical.close.eyebrow":"Choose the evidence surface","research-programme.technical.close.title":"Start with the contract draft","research-programme.technical.close.titleAccent":"then take the task papers","research-programme.technical.close.body":"Read the ABMN family paper first, then move to the task draft whose memory, decoder and measurement scope match the system you need to challenge.","research-programme.technical.close.primary":"Open the paper family","research-programme.technical.close.secondary":"Propose a research question","research-programme.business.close.eyebrow":"Choose the decision boundary","research-programme.business.close.title":"Start with the unknown","research-programme.business.close.titleAccent":"not with the roadmap","research-programme.business.close.body":"Bring the baseline, consequence, decision owner and stop rule. Dweve can then determine whether the question belongs in a research partnership or in an existing product conversation.","research-programme.business.close.primary":"Review the evidence library","research-programme.business.close.secondary":"Discuss the question","research-programme.consumer.close.eyebrow":"Choose a way in","research-programme.consumer.close.title":"Read a draft or a report","research-programme.consumer.close.titleAccent":"and see the state it is in","research-programme.consumer.close.body":"The paper family explains the technical programme. The two reports show the same evidence discipline applied to questions about digital control and road safety.","research-programme.consumer.close.primary":"Browse the draft papers","research-programme.consumer.close.secondary":"Ask about the research","research-programme.close.panel.title":"What is on the shelf","research-programme.close.panel.tag":"STATUS ATTACHED","research-programme.close.panel.row.0.label":"Working papers","research-programme.close.panel.row.0.value":"Six ABMN drafts dated July 2026, released on request","research-programme.close.panel.row.1.label":"Investigative reports","research-programme.close.panel.row.1.value":"Two titles, both readable in Books","research-programme.close.panel.row.2.label":"Active programmes","research-programme.close.panel.row.2.value":"Jacquard, Forge and Mycelia, each with its question","research-programme.close.panel.foot":"Every entry states its own state. Availability is not maturity.","research-programme.map.secondary1":"A programme holds an open question and a method for testing it. It does not promise a release date or a product outcome, and the state it reports belongs to the question rather than to a roadmap.","research-programme.map.secondary2":"A paper, report, and release each carry a different evidence status. The page keeps those output families separate so availability is not mistaken for maturity. A draft you can request is still a draft.","research-programme.lines.secondary1":"Jacquard, Forge, and Mycelia are active research lines with distinct mechanisms, access routes, and limits. Their programme pages state the question before the prospective benefit.","research-programme.lines.secondary2":"HEDL sits outside this active register because it has already moved into the open-source foundation. Its old research URL now resolves to that released home, where the work is listed with the open-source set.","research-programme.abmn.secondary1":"The current ABMN set contains six working papers dated July 2026: one family definition, four task-specific instantiations each with its own memory layout and decoder, and one paper asking whether the same build contract holds for a structurally different learner.","research-programme.abmn.secondary2":"Each title maps to an authoritative source directory, and the draft behind it is released on request. The repository does not establish a publication venue or peer-review outcome, so the drafts are offered here as drafts.","research-programme.lifecycle.secondary1":"Learning may use mutable counters and corpus state. Stripping removes build-only state and emits the artifact that the deployed decoder will consume, so nothing from the build survives into serving.","research-programme.lifecycle.secondary2":"Execution is task-specific: Viterbi decoding, classifier recall, reranking, and top-k retrieval do not become interchangeable merely because they share a family contract.","research-programme.evidence.secondary1":"A measurement is only meaningful with its task, data, configuration, comparison, and execution environment attached. Those conditions define the reach of the claim.","research-programme.evidence.secondary2":"Limitations and failure cases belong in the same record as positive results. A deterministic run makes the process replayable; it does not make the scientific conclusion automatic.","research-programme.reports.secondary1":"Investigative reports are a separate research output family. They assemble sources and arguments around public questions rather than presenting a model benchmark.","research-programme.reports.secondary2":"The Sovereignty Illusion is a living report. Traffic Safety in the Netherlands is a 2026 investigative report. Both retain readable editions in Books, with their methods and sources kept beside the argument.","research-programme.transfer.secondary1":"A research artifact does not enter the product estate by proximity or by name. It must cross explicit engineering, security, operational, and ownership gates, and every one of those gates is named.","research-programme.transfer.secondary2":"If the contract, tests, documentation, or accountable owner are missing, the artifact remains research. The promotion gate makes that boundary visible rather than leaving it to judgement.","research-programme.partners.secondary1":"A partner packet begins with one bounded question, a baseline, a contribution, and a review method. Access follows the research design rather than preceding it, so the scope is settled first.","research-programme.partners.secondary2":"Publication rights, evidence ownership, confidentiality, and an exit rule must be clear at the start. The packet records those terms before any work begins, and the exit rule is written with them.","research-programme.statusBanner.lead":"Name the state","research-programme.statusBanner.accent":"and read the claim","research-programme.statusBanner.body2":"Question, prototype, draft snapshot, and release are different states. Moving between them requires evidence, not a change of label.","research-programme.statusBanner.instrument":"Research status","research-programme.statusBanner.tag":"STATUS ATTACHED","research-programme.statusBanner.current":"Current artifact","research-programme.statusBanner.verdictLabel":"Reading rule","research-programme.statusBanner.verdict":"Availability never upgrades maturity","research-programme.statusBanner.footer":"Every claim keeps the state of the artifact that supports it.","research-programme.draftBanner.lead":"The drafts are real","research-programme.draftBanner.accent":"but the venue is not","research-programme.draftBanner.body2":"All six titles come from an authoritative source directory. The repository does not establish a venue, acceptance decision, or peer-review outcome.","research-programme.draftBanner.instrument":"Working-paper boundary","research-programme.draftBanner.present":"Present in the repository","research-programme.draftBanner.notEstablished":"Not established","research-programme.draftBanner.source":"Authoritative source","research-programme.draftBanner.sourceBody":"One paper directory for each of the six titles","research-programme.draftBanner.pdf":"Complete draft","research-programme.draftBanner.pdfBody":"Released on request for every listed title","research-programme.draftBanner.venue":"Publication venue","research-programme.draftBanner.venueBody":"No journal or conference is recorded","research-programme.draftBanner.review":"Peer-review outcome","research-programme.draftBanner.reviewBody":"No external decision is recorded","research-programme.draftBanner.verdictLabel":"Library status","research-programme.draftBanner.verdict":"Six July 2026 working papers","research-programme.outputBanner.eyebrow":"Output identity","research-programme.outputBanner.lead":"Evidence first","research-programme.outputBanner.accent":"and name its type","research-programme.outputBanner.body1":"Working papers and investigative reports answer different questions and carry different update rules.","research-programme.outputBanner.body2":"The research record keeps the artifact type, date, and living status visible beside the route used to read it.","research-programme.outputBanner.instrument":"Output receipt","research-programme.outputBanner.tag":"TYPE PRESERVED","research-programme.outputBanner.paper":"ABMN paper family","research-programme.outputBanner.paperBody":"Six technical working drafts","research-programme.outputBanner.living":"The Sovereignty Illusion","research-programme.outputBanner.livingBody":"Living investigative report","research-programme.outputBanner.dated":"Traffic Safety in the Netherlands","research-programme.outputBanner.datedBody":"Dated investigative report","research-programme.outputBanner.verdictLabel":"Record rule","research-programme.outputBanner.verdict":"Do not collapse unlike outputs into one publication claim","research-programme.outputBanner.footer":"The reader route changes with the output family; the evidence status travels with it.","research-programme.map.frameMeta":"4 output families","research-programme.lines.side.tag":"3 active","research-programme.lines.frameMeta":"Question · mechanism · boundary","research-programme.abmn.side.tag":"6 drafts","research-programme.abmn.frameMeta":"July 2026 · drafts on request","research-programme.abmn.paperStatus":"Working paper","research-programme.lifecycle.frameMeta":"4 memory organisations","research-programme.evidence.frameMeta":"Claim status attached","research-programme.reports.side.tag":"2 readable","research-programme.reports.frameMeta":"2 reader editions","research-programme.transfer.side.tag":"7 gates","research-programme.transfer.frameMeta":"Research ≠ product","research-programme.partners.side.tag":"Bound first","research-programme.partners.frameMeta":"Question before access"}